Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2025

10:20
Simultaneous Assessment of Kinship, Division Number, and Phenotype via Flow Cytometry for Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells
Published on: March 24, 2023
1.6K
True volumetric counting of CD34+ cells using flow cytometry
Laura G Rico1, Jorge Bardina1, Roser Salvia1
1Functional Cytomics Lab, Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute (IGTP), ICO-Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Badalona (Barcelona), Spain.
Journal of Immunological Methods
|February 23, 2024
Summary
Direct volumetric counting of CD34+ cells offers a promising alternative to traditional methods. This approach simplifies sample preparation and reduces analysis subjectivity for accurate stem cell yield prediction.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Flow Cytometry
- Stem Cell Analysis
Background:
- CD34+ cell counting is crucial for predicting mobilized peripheral blood stem cell yield.
- Traditional flow cytometry methods using microbeads face challenges like the vanishing counting bead phenomenon.
- Most flow cytometers lack volumetric counting capabilities found in hematology analyzers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate direct true volumetric counting of CD34+ cells as an alternative to bead-based methods.
- To compare CD34+ cell enumeration using volumetric and non-volumetric flow cytometry systems.
- To assess the accuracy and agreement of volumetric counting for rare cell analysis.
Main Methods:
- Comparison of CD34+ cell counts between non-volumetric (FC500) and volumetric (Attune NxT) flow cytometers.
- Utilized direct true volumetric counting under a continuous flow pump.
- Employed linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis to assess method agreement and accuracy.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant differences were found between CD34+ cell counts obtained using beads on different systems or using volumetric vs. non-volumetric methods on the same system.
- Linear regression confirmed the accuracy of both volumetric and non-volumetric counting methods.
- Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated good agreement between the volumetric and non-volumetric approaches.
Conclusions:
- CD34+ cell enumeration using a volumetric system is comparable to current bead-based counting systems.
- Volumetric counting offers advantages in simplifying sample preparation and reducing analysis subjectivity.
- This method presents a viable alternative for accurate CD34+ cell enumeration in clinical settings.

