Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis DGGE
Published on: February 25, 2007
Authorship and ChatGPT: a Conservative View
René van Woudenberg1, Chris Ranalli1, Daniel Bracker1
1Department of Philosophy, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Abstract:
Is ChatGPT an author? Given its capacity to generate something that reads like human-written text in response to prompts, it might seem natural to ascribe authorship to ChatGPT. However, we argue that ChatGPT is not an author. ChatGPT fails to meet the criteria of authorship because it lacks the ability to perform illocutionary speech acts such as promising or asserting, lacks the fitting mental states like knowledge, belief, or intention, and cannot take responsibility for the texts it produces. Three perspectives are compared: liberalism (which ascribes authorship to ChatGPT), conservatism (which denies ChatGPT's authorship for normative and metaphysical reasons), and moderatism (which treats ChatGPT as if it possesses authorship without committing to the existence of mental states like knowledge, belief, or intention). We conclude that conservatism provides a more nuanced understanding of authorship in AI than liberalism and moderatism, without denying the significant potential, influence, or utility of AI technologies such as ChatGPT.
Related Concept Videos
Conservative Forces
Non-conservative Forces
Also unlike their conservative counterparts, they are path-dependent; where the object starts and stops does matter. For example, a grinding wheel applies a...
Attribution Theory
Hardy-Weinberg Principle
Conservative Site-specific Recombination and Phase Variation
The recognition sites for Cre recombinase called LoxP...
Groupthink

