Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A Boudreau Leblanc, B Williams-Jones

    Journal International De Bioethique Et D'Ethique Des Sciences
    |February 29, 2024
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Collaborative governance requires navigating diverse stakeholder perspectives. The co P·R·I·M·O·V bioethics tool aids this by analyzing conflicts of interest, fostering cooperation in technosocial initiatives.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A Mixed-Methods Study Exploring Colombian Adolescents' Access to Sexual and Reproductive Health Services: The Need for a Relational Autonomy Approach.

    Journal of bioethical inquiry·2024
    Same author

    Mapping responsible conduct in the uncharted field of research-creation: A scoping review.

    Accountability in research·2019
    Same author

    Assessment of a multimedia-based prospective method to support public deliberations on health technology design: participant survey findings and qualitative insights.

    BMC health services research·2016
    Same author

    How do medical device manufacturers' websites frame the value of health innovation? An empirical ethics analysis of five Canadian innovations.

    Medicine, health care, and philosophy·2011
    Same author

    Private genetic testing in Canada: a summary.

    Health law review·2005
    Same author

    Re-framing the discussion: commercial genetic testing in Canada.

    Health law journal·2000
    Same journal

    Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences·2026
    Same journal

    Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences·2026
    Same journal

    Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences·2026
    Same journal

    Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences·2026
    Same journal

    Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences·2026
    Same journal

    Chapter 4. Neurotechnologies: striking a balance between scientific progress and privacy

    Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Bioethics
    • Governance Studies
    • Technosocial Initiatives

    Context:

    • Collaborative governance is increasingly vital for sustainable development.
    • Diverse stakeholders in technosocial initiatives present complex challenges in decision-making.
    • Existing frameworks may not adequately address the multifaceted nature of stakeholder engagement.

    Purpose:

    • To introduce the co P·R·I·M·O·V (Position, Role, Interest, Mission, Observation, Values) bioethics tool.
    • To provide a user-friendly method for professional ethicists to enhance collaborative governance.
    • To apply Conflict of Interest (CoI) analysis principles to technosocial initiatives.

    Summary:

    • The co P·R·I·M·O·V tool structures stakeholder analysis based on positions, roles, interests, missions, observations, and values.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • It adapts Conflict of Interest (CoI) analysis to anticipate and manage ethical challenges in collaborative governance.
  • A case study on monitoring antibiotic use in animal health in Quebec demonstrated its utility.

    • Impact:

    • Facilitates negotiation and co-construction of common frames of reference among stakeholders.
    • Enhances the practice of sustainable, collaborative, and democratic development of technosocial initiatives.
    • Offers a strategic approach to managing ethical complexities for improved program governance and cooperation.