Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Uncertainty Principle04:08

The Uncertainty Principle

23.4K
Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He...
23.4K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

73.7K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
73.7K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

38.2K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
38.2K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

518
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
518
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

682
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
682
Estimation of the Physical Quantities01:05

Estimation of the Physical Quantities

4.3K
On many occasions, physicists, other scientists, and engineers need to make estimates of a particular quantity. These are sometimes referred to as guesstimates, order-of-magnitude approximations, back-of-the-envelope calculations, or Fermi calculations. The physicist Enrico Fermi was famous for his ability to estimate various kinds of data with surprising precision. Estimating does not mean guessing a number or a formula at random. Instead, estimation means using prior experience and sound...
4.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Maximally Nonprojective Measurements Are Not Always Symmetric Informationally Complete.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Operationally classical simulation of quantum states.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Prepare-and-Measure Scenarios with Photon-Number Constraints.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Quantum Stochastic Communication via High-Dimensional Entanglement.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Simulating Quantum Instruments with Projective Measurements and Quantum Postprocessing.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Bound Entangled States Are Useful in Prepare-and-Measure Scenarios.

Physical review letters·2025
Same journal

Erratum: Bacterial Turbulence at Compressible Fluid Interfaces [Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 138301 (2026)].

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Unveiling Light-Quark Yukawa Flavor Structure via Dihadron Fragmentation at Lepton Colliders.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Adaptable Route to Fast Coherent State Transport via Bang-Bang-Bang Protocols.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Topological Transition and Emergence of Elasticity of Dislocation in Skyrmion Lattice: Beyond Kittel's Magnetic-Polar Analogy.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Pound-Drever-Hall Method for Superconducting-Qubit Readout.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Coupling a ^{73}Ge Nuclear Spin to an Electrostatically Defined Quantum Dot in Silicon.

Physical review letters·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Measurement of Quantum Interference in a Silicon Ring Resonator Photon Source
12:19

Measurement of Quantum Interference in a Silicon Ring Resonator Photon Source

Published on: April 4, 2017

8.4K

Quantum Steering with Imprecise Measurements.

Armin Tavakoli1

  • 1Physics Department, Lund University, Box 118, 22100 Lund, Sweden.

Physical Review Letters
|March 1, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Measurement imprecision in quantum steering experiments can lead to false positives, especially in high-dimensional systems. This study introduces a method to account for such imprecision, providing accurate bounds for steering tests.

More Related Videos

The Generation of Higher-order Laguerre-Gauss Optical Beams for High-precision Interferometry
12:14

The Generation of Higher-order Laguerre-Gauss Optical Beams for High-precision Interferometry

Published on: August 12, 2013

21.8K
Quantitative and Qualitative Examination of Particle-particle Interactions Using Colloidal Probe Nanoscopy
13:15

Quantitative and Qualitative Examination of Particle-particle Interactions Using Colloidal Probe Nanoscopy

Published on: July 18, 2014

11.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Measurement of Quantum Interference in a Silicon Ring Resonator Photon Source
12:19

Measurement of Quantum Interference in a Silicon Ring Resonator Photon Source

Published on: April 4, 2017

8.4K
The Generation of Higher-order Laguerre-Gauss Optical Beams for High-precision Interferometry
12:14

The Generation of Higher-order Laguerre-Gauss Optical Beams for High-precision Interferometry

Published on: August 12, 2013

21.8K
Quantitative and Qualitative Examination of Particle-particle Interactions Using Colloidal Probe Nanoscopy
13:15

Quantitative and Qualitative Examination of Particle-particle Interactions Using Colloidal Probe Nanoscopy

Published on: July 18, 2014

11.0K

Area of Science:

  • Quantum Information Science
  • Quantum Foundations
  • Experimental Quantum Physics

Background:

  • Quantum steering is a key quantum phenomenon demonstrating non-classical correlations.
  • Previous steering inequality tests often assume perfect measurement control.
  • Real-world experiments face challenges with measurement device imperfections.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of measurement imprecision on quantum steering.
  • To develop a robust method for analyzing steering inequalities with imperfect measurements.
  • To extend the analysis to generalized quantum steering scenarios.

Main Methods:

  • Introduction of a theoretical framework incorporating measurement imprecision into steering inequalities.
  • Derivation of analytical and computable bounds for steering tests.
  • Application of the method to bipartite and generalized steering scenarios.

Main Results:

  • Small measurement imprecision can significantly increase false positive rates in steering tests.
  • This effect is amplified in high-dimensional quantum systems.
  • The developed method provides optimal and universally applicable steering bounds.

Conclusions:

  • Accounting for measurement imprecision is crucial for reliable quantum steering experiments.
  • The proposed method enhances the robustness and applicability of steering tests.
  • This work advances the understanding and experimental verification of quantum correlations.