Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Novel Percutaneous Approach for Deployment of 3D Printed Coronary Stenosis Implants in Swine Models of Ischemic Heart Disease
Published on: February 18, 2020
Guide catheter extension use are associated with higher procedural success in chronic total occlusion percutaneous
Evandro M Filho1, Gustavo N Araujo2,3, Guilherme P Machado4
1Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Maceió, Maceió, Brazil.
Insights
Guide catheter extensions (GCEs) improve procedural success in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO PCI). While GCEs are used in complex cases, they do not increase adverse outcomes like death or stroke.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Guide catheter extensions (GCEs) enhance support and facilitate device delivery during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- However, concerns exist regarding potential increased risks of complications with aggressive instrumentation using GCEs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of GCEs on procedural success and complication rates in patients undergoing chronic total occlusion (CTO) PCI.
- To compare outcomes between patients who did and did not receive GCEs during CTO PCI.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from the multicenter LATAM CTO Registry, including 3049 patients from August 2010 to August 2021.
- Procedural success defined as <30% residual stenosis and TIMI 3 distal flow. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) included death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and stroke.
- Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to balance baseline characteristics between GCE and non-GCE groups.
Main Results:
- GCEs were utilized in 14.5% of patients, often in older individuals with more comorbidities and complex coronary anatomy (higher J-CTO score).
- After PSM, procedural success was significantly higher in the GCE group (87.7%) compared to the non-GCE group (80.5%), p=0.007.
- Incidence of coronary perforation, bleeding, in-hospital death, and MACCE were similar between the groups post-PSM.
Conclusions:
- In contemporary CTO PCI, GCE use is associated with improved procedural success.
- Despite being used in patients with more complex anatomy and comorbidities, GCEs did not lead to a higher incidence of adverse outcomes.
- GCEs represent a valuable tool for enhancing procedural success in complex CTO PCI without increasing major complications.
Background:
Guide catheter extensions (GCEs) increase support and facilitate equipment delivery, but aggressive instrumentation may be associated with a higher risk of complications.
Aim:
Our aim was to assess the impact of GCEs on procedural success and complications in patients submitted to chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Methods:
We analyzed data from the multicenter LATAM CTO Registry. Procedural success was defined as <30% residual stenosis and TIMI 3 distal flow. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) was defined as the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and stroke. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare outcomes with and without GCE use.
Results:
From August 2010 to August 2021, 3049 patients were included. GCEs were used in 438 patients (14.5%). In unadjusted analysis, patients in the GCE group were older and had more comorbidities. The median J-CTO score and its components were higher in the GCE group. After PSM, procedural success was higher with GCE use (87.7% vs. 80.5%, p = 0.007). The incidence of coronary perforation (odds ratio [OR]: 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-2.71, p = 0.230), bleeding (OR: 1.99, 95% CI: 0.41-2.41, p = 0.986), in-hospital death (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 0.54-3.62, p = 0.495) and MACCE (OR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.52-2.19, p = 0.850) were similar in both groups.
Conclusion:
In a contemporary, multicenter cohort of patients undergoing CTO PCI, GCEs were used in older patients, with more comorbidities and complex anatomy. After PSM, GCE use was associated with higher procedural success, and similar incidence of adverse outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

