Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Somatosensory Event-related Potentials from Orofacial Skin Stretch Stimulation
Published on: December 18, 2015
Interrupted mosaic speech revisited: Gain and loss in intelligibility by stretchinga)
Kazuo Ueda1, Masashi Hashimoto2, Hiroshige Takeichi3
1Department of Acoustic Design, Faculty of Design/Research Center for Applied Perceptual Science/Research and Development Center for Five-Sense Devices, Kyushu University, 4-9-1 Shiobaru, Minami-ku, Fukuoka 815-8540, Japan.
Abstract:
Our previous investigation on the effect of stretching spectrotemporally degraded and temporally interrupted speech stimuli showed remarkable intelligibility gains [Udea, Takeichi, and Wakamiya (2022). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 152(2), 970-980]. In this previous study, however, gap durations and temporal resolution were confounded. In the current investigation, we therefore observed the intelligibility of so-called mosaic speech while dissociating the effects of interruption and temporal resolution. The intelligibility of mosaic speech (20 frequency bands and 20 ms segment duration) declined from 95% to 78% and 33% by interrupting it with 20 and 80 ms gaps. Intelligibility improved, however, to 92% and 54% (14% and 21% gains for 20 and 80 ms gaps, respectively) by stretching mosaic segments to fill silent gaps (n = 21). By contrast, the intelligibility was impoverished to a minimum of 9% (7% loss) when stretching stimuli interrupted with 160 ms gaps. Explanations based on auditory grouping, modulation unmasking, or phonemic restoration may account for the intelligibility improvement by stretching, but not for the loss. The probability summation model accounted for "U"-shaped intelligibility curves and the gain and loss of intelligibility, suggesting that perceptual unit length and speech rate may affect the intelligibility of spectrotemporally degraded speech stimuli.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Interference: Path Lengths
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
Unsoundness of Aggregate due to Volume Change
Sound Waves: Interference
Reconstruction of Signal using Interpolation
Interference and Decay
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Expansion and Contraction in Masonry Walls
To...

