Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...

Nursing Evaluation

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.

Data Collection II

Data Collection II

The nursing history captures and records the patient's health status, so that a care plan evolves to meet the patient's individual needs. The nursing health history is a part of the initial assessment. A comprehensive history covers all health dimensions and plays a significant role in the assessment process. A comprehensive history includes the patient's biographical information, reasons for seeking health care, expectations, present and past health history, medications, and...

Surveys

Surveys

Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.

Purpose of Health Records I

Purpose of Health Records I

The vital purpose of health records is to provide a complete and accurate account of a patient's medical history, including communication, diagnostic and therapeutic orders, care planning, research, and quality review.
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:

Data Validation

Data Validation

Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Long-term risks of major adverse cardiovascular events after acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Clinical kidney journal·2026

Same author

Time to Refresh: Design and Evaluation of Refresher Training to Sustain Procedural Teaching Skills.

Perspectives on medical education·2026

Same author

Why can't epidemiology be automated (yet)? Perhaps it shouldn't be.

International journal of epidemiology·2026

Same author

Computer Testing, Formative or Summative, and Proctoring: Does it Matter? Lessons Learned From the Dutch Interuniversity Progress Test of Medicine During the Corona Pandemic.

Perspectives on medical education·2026

Same author

The Effect of the Question Mark Option in Progress Testing: A Large-Scale Longitudinal Study.

Perspectives on medical education·2025

Same author

Bridging Assessment and Clinical Practice: The Added Value of Very Short Answer Questions in Medical Education.

The clinical teacher·2025

Same journal

Channelling Socrates to re-imagine asynchronous online learning.

Medical education·2026

Same journal

Moving beyond tokenism: A structured and intentional approach to embedding health advocacy in medical education.

Medical education·2026

Same journal

When I say … 'in situ simulation'.

Medical education·2026

Same journal

Examiner training and calibration for simulated clinical examinations: A scoping review.

Medical education·2026

Same journal

When systems set the limits of supervision.

Medical education·2026

Same journal

From psychometrics to partnerships: Broadening what counts as validity evidence.

Medical education·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

Understanding students' feedback use in medical progress testing: A qualitative interview study.

Elise V van Wijk¹, Floris M van Blankenstein¹, Roemer J Janse²

¹Center for Innovation in Medical Education, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Medical Education

|March 11, 2024

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Medical students face psychological barriers to using feedback from progress tests (PT). Addressing these challenges can improve feedback literacy and enhance the PT

More Related Videos

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Area of Science:

Medical Education
Student Feedback
Learning Sciences

Background:

Active engagement with feedback is essential for student learning and achievement.
Medical students receive feedback via progress tests (PT), but its effectiveness varies.
Limited research exists on feedback engagement within the PT context.

Purpose of the Study:

To explore medical students' utilization of feedback from progress testing.
To identify barriers and facilitators of feedback engagement in medical education.

Main Methods:

Qualitative interview study with 21 preclinical and clinical medical students.
Semi-structured interviews analyzed using template analysis.
A priori themes based on existing feedback utilization research.

Main Results:

Students encountered psychological barriers ('awareness', 'cognizance', 'agency', 'volition') affecting feedback use.
Factors like stakes, time, timing, and presentation hindered feedback utilization.
Feedback engagement increased during clinical rotations and when linked to performance and career insights.

Conclusions:

Understanding students' feedback utilization in progress testing is enhanced.
Addressing barriers can improve feedback literacy for students and teachers.
Optimizing feedback processes can transform the PT into a more effective learning tool.