Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Somatosensation

Somatosensation

The somatosensory system relays sensory information from the skin, mucous membranes, limbs, and joints. Somatosensation is more familiarly known as the sense of touch. A typical somatosensory pathway includes three types of long neurons: primary, secondary, and tertiary. Primary neurons have cell bodies located near the spinal cord in groups of neurons called dorsal root ganglia. The sensory neurons of ganglia innervate designated areas of skin called dermatomes.

Design Example: Resistive Touchscreen

Design Example: Resistive Touchscreen

A device engineer plays a crucial role in designing user interfaces for mobile devices. One such interface is the resistive touchscreen, which fundamentally consists of two metallic layers: a flexible upper layer and a rigid lower layer, separated by a narrow gap. The high resistance between these two layers is a key characteristic of this design.
When a user touches the screen, the two layers make contact at a specific point known as the touchpoint. This contact reduces the resistance between...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Self-adaptive Under actuated Biomimetic Soft Robotic Hand Exoskeleton to Improve dexterity and Grasping Capabilities.

Bioinspiration & biomimetics·2026

Same author

From autonomy to alliance: Robotic foundation models must learn with us, not just for us.

Science robotics·2026

Same author

A Novel System for Physiological Signal Monitoring and Health-Informed Electrotactile Feedback for First Responders.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Same author

Lab-on-a-chip for enzyme activity monitoring in industrial solid-state fermentation processes compatible with R2R fabrication.

Lab on a chip·2026

Same author

NeuraLoop: a high bandwidth closed-loop human-machine interface.

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation·2025

Same author

Comparative study of HD-EMG electrode setups for Smart Mechatronic Ankle-Foot Orthoses development.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025

Same journal

Molecular links between reelin downregulation, topoisomerase IIβ alterations, and proteins involved in Alzheimer pathology in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line.

Experimental brain research·2026

Same journal

Motor cortex excitability during spine shape-judgment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a TMS motor evoked potential study.

Experimental brain research·2026

Same journal

Trajectory dynamics and endpoint accuracy in targeted ballistic contractions.

Experimental brain research·2026

Same journal

Exploring Sevoflurane promotes hippocampal neuron mitophagy in elderly postoperative cognitive dysfunction by HSP90AA1 based on network pharmacology.

Experimental brain research·2026

Same journal

Loading modulates monosynaptic transmission from spindle primary afferents to motoneurons in humans.

Experimental brain research·2026

Same journal

Energy-dependent cortical injury thresholds in high-frequency transcortical electrical stimulation: a biophysical study in a rat model.

Experimental brain research·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 30, 2026

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

Encoding contact size using static and dynamic electrotactile finger stimulation: natural decoding vs. trained cues.

Mauricio Carlos Henrich¹, Martin A Garenfeld¹, Jovana Malesevic²

¹Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Selma Lagerløfs Vej 249, 9260, Gistrup, Denmark.

Experimental Brain Research

|March 12, 2024

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Electrotactile stimulation can restore tactile feedback in virtual reality. Participants could perceive changes in stimulation size naturally, but training improved accuracy, and dynamic stimuli enhanced discrimination for better virtual object interaction.

Keywords:

Electrotactile stimulation Haptic device Size perception Tactile feedback Virtual reality

More Related Videos

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS

Published on: July 30, 2020

Capturing Dynamic Finger Gesturing with High-resolution Surface Electromyography and Computer Vision

Capturing Dynamic Finger Gesturing with High-resolution Surface Electromyography and Computer Vision

Published on: March 28, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 30, 2026

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS

Published on: July 30, 2020

Capturing Dynamic Finger Gesturing with High-resolution Surface Electromyography and Computer Vision

Capturing Dynamic Finger Gesturing with High-resolution Surface Electromyography and Computer Vision

Published on: March 28, 2025

Area of Science:

Haptics and Human-Computer Interaction
Neuroscience and Sensory Feedback

Background:

Electrotactile stimulation via matrix electrodes offers high-resolution tactile feedback for extended reality (XR).
Simulating changes in contact area size is crucial for realistic virtual object interaction.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the perception of stimulation area size increase using static and dynamic electrotactile stimuli.
To assess natural decoding of tactile size cues and the impact of training on improving size estimation.
To provide guidelines for modulating electrode activation for perceived size changes in XR.

Main Methods:

Participants received electrotactile stimulation on the index finger using 1 to 6 electrode pads.
Natural decoding was assessed by participants drawing stimulated areas and identifying size differences without training.
Training involved enumerating active pads to utilize non-natural cues, followed by re-assessment of size estimation.
Static and dynamic (moving) stimuli were employed to evaluate discrimination performance.

Main Results:

Participants perceived changes in stimulation size without training, with estimated area correlating to stimulated area (p < 0.001).
Natural decoding showed limitations, requiring gradual increases in active pads for significant perceived differences.
Training significantly improved size estimation, reducing the mismatch between activated and estimated pads to less than one.
Dynamic stimuli substantially enhanced discrimination, achieving a 100% median success rate for one-pad differences.

Conclusions:

Electrotactile stimulation can convey size information, but natural perception has limitations.
Training participants to use additional cues, like counting active pads, compensates for natural perception challenges.
Dynamic stimulation significantly improves the ability to discriminate between different stimulation sizes, offering practical guidelines for XR tactile feedback.