Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bayesian multivariate linear mixed-effects models with varied association structures.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same author

Guidance for chest-CT in children and adults with cystic fibrosis: A European perspective (part 2: special situations/respiratory complications).

Respiratory medicine·2026
Same author

Prediction of Motor Outcome in Patients With Severe Upper Limb Impairment After Stroke Using Motor Evoked Potentials.

Neurorehabilitation and neural repair·2026
Same author

Commonalities in rehabilitation data across diverse health conditions: a comparison of seven large European databases.

Journal of rehabilitation medicine·2026
Same author

Spike and Slab Regression for Nonstationary Gaussian Linear Mixed Effects Modeling of Rapid Disease Progression.

Environmetrics·2026
Same author

Feasibility and acceptability of a dysphagia screening intervention for hospitalised older patients - a process evaluation.

Disability and rehabilitation·2025
Same journal

Measurement Properties of the Functional Balance Ability Measure Across Subacute Neurologic Diagnoses.

Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation·2026
Same journal

Variability of the Behavioral Assessment Screening Tool for Mobile Health Using Ecological Momentary Assessment in Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury.

Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation·2026
Same journal

Comparative Clinical Effectiveness of Intra-Articular Leukocyte-Rich Platelet-Rich Plasma and Hyaluronic Acid in Treating Knee Osteoarthritis Pain: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation·2026
Same journal

Exploring Treatment Expectations and Clinical Meaningfulness in Spinal Muscular Atrophy Using the Goal Attainment Scale.

Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation·2026
Same journal

Biomechanical Properties Required for the Reduction of Knee Adduction Moment Using Gait Modification in Individuals With Obesity.

Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation·2026
Same journal

Implementing Co-innovation to Develop an Accessible, Web-Based Exercise Program for People with Multiple Sclerosis.

Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Author Spotlight: Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients With a Digital Occupational Training System
07:35

Author Spotlight: Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients With a Digital Occupational Training System

Published on: December 29, 2023

1.2K

External Validation of a Dynamic Prediction Model for Upper Limb Function After Stroke.

Iris C Brunner1,2, Eleni-Rosalina Andrinopoulou3,4, Ruud Selles5,6

  • 1Hammel Neurorehabilitation Centre and University Research Clinic, Hammel, Denmark.

Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation
|March 14, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study externally validated a dynamic prediction model for upper limb function after stroke. The model showed limited clinical usability, especially for severe impairments early post-stroke.

Keywords:
AlgorithmsNeurological rehabilitationStrokeUpper limb

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Through Advanced Robotic and Neuromodulation Technologies
05:28

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Through Advanced Robotic and Neuromodulation Technologies

Published on: October 11, 2024

571
Author Spotlight: Enhancing Post-Stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation with Robotic Technologies for Improved Motor Recovery and Functional Outcomes
04:49

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Post-Stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation with Robotic Technologies for Improved Motor Recovery and Functional Outcomes

Published on: September 6, 2024

740

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Author Spotlight: Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients With a Digital Occupational Training System
07:35

Author Spotlight: Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients With a Digital Occupational Training System

Published on: December 29, 2023

1.2K
Author Spotlight: Enhancing Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Through Advanced Robotic and Neuromodulation Technologies
05:28

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Through Advanced Robotic and Neuromodulation Technologies

Published on: October 11, 2024

571
Author Spotlight: Enhancing Post-Stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation with Robotic Technologies for Improved Motor Recovery and Functional Outcomes
04:49

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Post-Stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation with Robotic Technologies for Improved Motor Recovery and Functional Outcomes

Published on: September 6, 2024

740

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Rehabilitation Medicine
  • Clinical Prediction Modeling

Background:

  • Accurate prediction of upper limb (UL) function post-stroke is crucial for rehabilitation planning.
  • Existing dynamic prediction models require external validation in diverse cohorts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To externally validate a dynamic prediction model for predicting upper limb function at 6 months post-stroke.
  • To assess the model's prediction accuracy across different severity levels and time points.

Main Methods:

  • External validation using data from a prospective Danish cohort study (N=80).
  • Prediction of Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) scores at 6 months using baseline (2 weeks) and 3-month post-stroke data.
  • Assessment of prediction accuracy for mild, moderate, and severe UL impairment categories.

Main Results:

  • The model performed best for patients with mild UL impairment (median error 3) and worst for severe impairment (median error 30) at baseline.
  • Prediction accuracy significantly improved when 3-month data was included compared to 2-week baseline data.

Conclusions:

  • The dynamic prediction model has limited clinical usability for early prediction (2 weeks) and for patients with severe UL impairments.
  • Refinement of the model using biomarker data may enhance its predictive capabilities.