Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2025

04:42
Treating Low Back Pain in Failed Back Surgery Patients with Multicolumn-lead Spinal Cord Stimulation
Published on: June 26, 2018
14.5K
First evidence of a biomarker-based dose-response relationship in chronic pain using physiological closed-loop spinal
Leah Muller1, Jason Pope2, Paul Verrills3
1Saluda Medical US, Bloomington, Minnesota, USA Leah.Muller@saludamedical.com.
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
|March 20, 2024
Summary
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) therapy shows a dose-response relationship between electrical stimulation metrics and pain relief. Objective electrophysiological measures can optimize individual patient outcomes for better pain management.
Area of Science:
- Neuromodulation
- Pain Management
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) uses electricity as a pain relief medication, unlike conventional drugs with defined plasma concentrations.
- Open-loop SCS delivery is inconsistent due to epidural space dynamics, leading to variable electric field activation.
- Physiologic closed-loop control (PCLC) devices offer consistent, accurate SCS therapy, minimizing dosage errors per FDA guidance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the relationship between neurophysiological indicator metrics and pain reduction in SCS patients.
- To establish objective measures for SCS therapy dose, neural activation, and accuracy.
- To explore the potential for personalized SCS therapy optimization.
Main Methods:
- Over 600 SCS patients were analyzed.
- Neurophysiological metrics including therapy dose, time above neural activation threshold, and therapy accuracy were assessed.
- These metrics were correlated with reported pain reduction.
Main Results:
- Significant relationships were found between objective SCS metrics and pain relief across the patient population.
- The study provides the first evidence of a dose-response relationship in SCS therapy.
- Higher electrical dose, increased time over the evoked compound action potential (ECAP) threshold, and greater therapy accuracy correlated with better patient outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Objective electrophysiological inputs are measurable and can inform SCS therapy optimization.
- Personalized SCS therapy can be enhanced by utilizing unique, objective, measurable electrophysiological inputs.
- The findings support the development of PCLC systems for more precise and effective SCS treatment.

