Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2025
A Mobile Outside-in Technique of Transforaminal Lumbar Endoscopy for Lumbar Disc Herniations
Published on: August 7, 2018
Lumbar sacralization and L4-L5 microdiscectomy, a prospective cohort study on radiologic and clinical outcomes
Pouya Omidi1, Saeid Abrishamkar1, Mehdi Mahmoodkhani1
1Neurosurgeon, Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Aim:
To evaluate the role of lumbar sacralization (LS) on the surgical outcomes of L4-L5 microdiscectomy.
Methods:
This prospective cohort study was conducted in a university referral hospital. The patients with L4-L5 disc herniation and eligible for microdiscectomy were enrolled and allocated in G1 (with LS) and G2 (no LS). After the L4-L5 microdiscectomy patients were followed, clinical and radiological parameters were collected to investigate the influence on the outcomes. Recurrence, low back outcome score (LBOS), and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) were defined as main outcomes.
Results:
Two hundred and forty patients (n = 120, each), were reviewed in the final analysis. There was no difference between groups regarding baseline characteristics. Postoperative radicular and back pain was more severe in LS(P < 0.05). Univariate analysis showed recurrence was significantly higher in LS with a direct correlation with postoperative back pain persistence and low LBOS (p = 0.001). Age had a negative impact on G2 recurrence(p = 0.008). LS had a negative impact on LBOS and ODI scores. Postoperative radicular pain and higher lumbar lordosis were associated with a higher disability (ODI) index.
Conclusion:
L4-L5 microdiscectomy in patients with lumbar sacralization was associated with higher recurrence rates, worse ODI and LBOS scores, persistent postoperative axial back pain, and radicular pain. Postoperative axial back pain and poor LBOS results could effectively predict a higher recurrence rate following L4-L5 microdiscectomy in lumbar sacralization.
