Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the CODE ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Program: A Quantitative and

Eka Ginanjar1, Arif Mansjoer, Lusiani Rusdi

  • 11. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia - Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia. 2. Integrated Cardiac Service Unit, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia. ekaginanjar.MD@gmail.com.

PubMed

Insights

The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated changes to the ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) program, impacting healthcare quality. Despite challenges, the STEMI program provided good patient services during the pandemic.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Healthcare Management
  • Public Health

Background:

  • The ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) program is a critical integrated healthcare service.
  • The COVID-19 pandemic significantly altered healthcare service delivery, including STEMI management.
  • Evaluating the quality of STEMI care during the pandemic is essential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the quality of the Code STEMI program during the COVID-19 pandemic using the Donabedian model.
  • To compare healthcare service quality metrics before and during the pandemic.
  • To understand stakeholder perspectives on STEMI care during COVID-19.

Main Methods:

  • A mixed-methods study combining quantitative and qualitative analyses.
  • Comparison of patient data (response time, outcomes, length of stay, cost) from pre-COVID-19 (2018-2020) and COVID-19 (2020-2022) periods.
  • Stakeholder interviews to gather qualitative insights on service quality.

Main Results:

  • A significant increase in patient length of stay was observed during the pandemic (6 days vs. 4 days).
  • No significant changes were found in Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE), in-hospital mortality, door-to-wire/needle times, or hospitalization costs.
  • Patients reported satisfaction with the responsiveness and quality of care during the COVID-19 period.

Conclusions:

  • Modified pathways were essential for the STEMI program due to COVID-19 screening.
  • The Donabedian model indicated a decrease in efficacy, effectiveness, efficiency, and optimality of the STEMI program during the pandemic.
  • Despite pandemic-related limitations, the STEMI program continued to deliver good quality care to patients.
Abstract