Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Antibiotic Efficacy Testing in an Ex vivo Model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms in the Cystic Fibrosis Lung
Published on: January 22, 2021
Why have SGLT2 Inhibitors Failed to Achieve the Desired Success in COVID-19?
Medine Cumhur Cure1, Erkan Cure2
1Medilab Laboratory and Imaging Center, Department of Biochemistry, Sisli, Istanbul, Turkey.
Abstract:
The SARS-CoV-2 virus emerged towards the end of 2019 and caused a major worldwide pandemic lasting at least 2 years, causing a disease called COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 caused a severe infection with direct cellular toxicity, stimulation of cytokine release, increased oxidative stress, disruption of endothelial structure, and thromboinflammation, as well as angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) down-regulation-mediated renin-angiotensin system (RAS) activation. In addition to glucosuria and natriuresis, sodium-glucose transport protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (SGLT2i) cause weight loss, a decrease in glucose levels with an insulin-independent mechanism, an increase in erythropoietin levels and erythropoiesis, an increase in autophagy and lysosomal degradation, Na+/H+-changer inhibition, prevention of ischemia/reperfusion injury, oxidative stress and they have many positive effects such as reducing inflammation and improving vascular function. There was great anticipation for SGLT2i in treating patients with diabetes with COVID-19, but current data suggest they are not very effective. Moreover, there has been great confusion in the literature about the effects of SGLT2i on COVID-19 patients with diabetes . Various factors, including increased SGLT1 activity, lack of angiotensin receptor blocker co-administration, the potential for ketoacidosis, kidney injury, and disruptions in fluid and electrolyte levels, may have hindered SGLT2i's effectiveness against COVID-19. In addition, the duration of use of SGLT2i and their impact on erythropoiesis, blood viscosity, cholesterol levels, and vitamin D levels may also have played a role in their failure to treat the virus. This article aims to uncover the reasons for the confusion in the literature and to unravel why SGLT2i failed to succeed in COVID-19 based on some solid evidence as well as speculative and personal perspectives.
Insights
Sodium-glucose transport protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors showed promise for treating COVID-19 in diabetic patients but were not effective. This review explores potential reasons for their failure, including drug interactions and physiological effects.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Endocrinology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) caused a global pandemic, leading to COVID-19, a disease with complex pathophysiology including cellular toxicity, inflammation, and renin-angiotensin system (RAS) activation.
- Sodium-glucose transport protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (SGLT2i) offer benefits like weight loss, improved glycemic control, and enhanced vascular function, raising hopes for their use in diabetic patients with COVID-19.
- Existing literature presents conflicting data and confusion regarding the efficacy of SGLT2i in managing COVID-19 patients with diabetes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate and clarify the reasons behind the ineffectiveness of SGLT2 inhibitors in treating COVID-19 patients with diabetes.
- To analyze the potential detrimental effects and interactions of SGLT2 inhibitors in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
- To reconcile conflicting findings in the literature concerning SGLT2 inhibitors and COVID-19.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing scientific literature on SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, SGLT2 inhibitors, and their interactions.
- Analysis of physiological effects of SGLT2 inhibitors, including impacts on glucose transport, erythropoiesis, and the renin-angiotensin system.
- Exploration of potential confounding factors such as drug co-administration, ketoacidosis risk, and electrolyte imbalances.
Main Results:
- Current data indicate that SGLT2 inhibitors are not highly effective in treating COVID-19, even in diabetic patients.
- Several factors may have contributed to the lack of efficacy, including increased SGLT1 activity, absence of angiotensin receptor blocker co-administration, and potential for adverse events like ketoacidosis and kidney injury.
- The duration of SGLT2 inhibitor use and their influence on erythropoiesis, blood viscosity, and lipid profiles may also have impacted outcomes.
Conclusions:
- SGLT2 inhibitors failed to demonstrate significant therapeutic benefit in COVID-19 patients with diabetes due to a combination of pharmacological and physiological factors.
- Further research is needed to fully understand the complex interplay between SGLT2 inhibition and SARS-CoV-2 infection to guide future therapeutic strategies.
- The findings highlight the importance of considering drug-specific mechanisms and patient-specific conditions when evaluating treatment efficacy during pandemics.
Related Concept Videos
Glucose Transporters
Facilitated diffusion-glucose transporters (GLUTs) are encoded by the solute-linked carrier (SLC) family 2, subfamily A gene family, or SLC2A. The 14 GLUT protein members are distributed into three classes:
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors
Secondary Active Transport
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: α-Glucosidase Inhibitors
Acarbose and miglitol are...
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Antimicrobials as Antidiarrheal Agents

