Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Eyewitness Memory01:22

Eyewitness Memory

108
Eyewitness memory refers to the recollection of events by someone who has directly witnessed them, often serving as critical evidence in legal settings. This type of memory is commonly used in criminal cases where a witness describes details like a suspect's appearance, clothing, or behavior during a crime. However, despite its perceived reliability, eyewitness memory is prone to significant errors.
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
108
False Memories01:18

False Memories

87
False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
87
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

99
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
99
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?01:17

Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

27.7K
The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
27.7K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.4K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.4K
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

What's in a Name? Public Perceptions of Sex Worker Professionals Are Differentially Influenced by Terminology.

Journal of sex research·2026
Same author

The Influence of Victim Blame Statements and Expert Testimony on Jury Decision Making During Cases of Sexual Assault.

Behavioral sciences & the law·2026
Same author

Diverging Decisions? A Comparison of Jury Verdict Procedures.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Validity of forensic cartridge-case comparisons.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.1K

Do inconclusive forensic decisions disadvantage the innocent?

Stephanie Madon1, Kayla A Burd2, Max Guyll1

  • 1School of Interdisciplinary Forensics, Arizona State University.

Law and Human Behavior
|April 4, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Inconclusive forensic evidence can disadvantage the innocent, leading to more incriminating legal judgments compared to clearly exculpatory findings. This risk of wrongful conviction highlights the need for careful interpretation of forensic science.

More Related Videos

Enhanced Genetic Analysis of Single Human Bioparticles Recovered by Simplified Micromanipulation from Forensic ‘Touch DNA’ Evidence
11:49

Enhanced Genetic Analysis of Single Human Bioparticles Recovered by Simplified Micromanipulation from Forensic ‘Touch DNA’ Evidence

Published on: March 9, 2015

15.7K
An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.1K
Enhanced Genetic Analysis of Single Human Bioparticles Recovered by Simplified Micromanipulation from Forensic ‘Touch DNA’ Evidence
11:49

Enhanced Genetic Analysis of Single Human Bioparticles Recovered by Simplified Micromanipulation from Forensic ‘Touch DNA’ Evidence

Published on: March 9, 2015

15.7K
An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.5K

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Science
  • Legal Psychology
  • Criminal Justice

Background:

  • Inconclusive forensic decisions may unfairly disadvantage innocent individuals in legal proceedings.
  • The impact of inconclusive forensic evidence on legal judgments requires thorough investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine if inconclusive forensic decisions lead to more incriminating legal judgments than clearly exculpatory ones.
  • To investigate the underlying mechanisms, such as confirmation bias or communication errors, behind the effect of inconclusive forensic evidence.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments involving mock jurors (N=492 and N=1,002) were conducted.
  • Participants evaluated cases with varying forensic evidence outcomes: match, no-match, inconclusive, unsuitable, or no evidence.

Main Results:

  • Inconclusive decisions resulted in less incriminating judgments than 'match' but more than 'no-match' forensic decisions.
  • Inconclusive evidence was interpreted similarly to cases with no forensic evidence or unsuitable evidence, suggesting a communication error.
  • The risk of wrongful conviction is heightened when inconclusive forensic evidence replaces a clearly exculpatory finding.

Conclusions:

  • Inconclusive forensic decisions can pose a risk to the innocent by preventing a definitive exculpatory outcome.
  • Findings suggest that the interpretation of inconclusive forensic evidence may be influenced by communication errors rather than perceptual accuracy or confirmation bias.