Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

99
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
99
Factorial Design02:01

Factorial Design

13.0K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
13.0K
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

8.0K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
8.0K
Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

11.3K
An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
11.3K
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

2.8K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
2.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spiral comparison: operationalizing iterative integration in mixed methods research.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same author

Attitudes, opinions and practice patterns regarding anaesthesia providers' use of vasopressors: protocol for a multicentre mixed-methods study.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Updating the Good Reporting of a Mixed Methods Study (GRAMMS) Reporting Guidelines: Protocol for a Methodological Review and Modified Delphi Process.

JMIR research protocols·2026
Same author

Real-Time Type 1 Diabetes Self-Management Decision-Making in Adolescents: Protocol for a Longitudinal Mixed Methods Study Using Text Messaging and Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

JMIR research protocols·2026
Same author

Native American Women's Willingness to Screen for Both Cervical and Colorectal Cancer at Home.

Cancer medicine·2026
Same author

Patient symptoms, confidence, and adherence during the first 8 weeks of targeted oral anticancer agent treatment.

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.7K

Grand rounds in methodology: designing for integration in mixed methods research.

Timothy C Guetterman1, Milisa Manojlovich2

  • 1University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA tguetter@med.umich.edu.

BMJ Quality & Safety
|April 4, 2024
PubMed
Summary

This study guides researchers on integrating mixed methods research for better quality and safety insights. Proper integration across all study levels enhances understanding of complex healthcare problems.

Keywords:
Evaluation methodologyHealth services researchImplementation scienceQualitative researchStatistics

More Related Videos

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.3K
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.7K
Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.3K
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare quality and safety research
  • Mixed methods research methodology

Background:

  • Mixed methods research is valuable for complex quality and safety issues.
  • Integration is central to mixed methods but often lacking in proposals and publications.
  • Failure to integrate diminishes the benefits of mixed methods research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To guide quality and safety researchers in planning and designing integrated mixed methods studies.
  • To provide strategies for achieving meaningful integration in mixed methods research.
  • To enhance the rigor and impact of mixed methods research in healthcare.

Main Methods:

  • The article focuses on conceptual guidance for study design.
  • It emphasizes a holistic approach to integration across multiple study levels.
  • Key levels for integration include research question, design, methods, results, and reporting/interpretation.

Main Results:

  • Meaningful integration can be achieved by centering it at the research question, design, methods, results, and reporting/interpretation levels.
  • A holistic approach to integration across these levels is crucial.
  • Facilitating integration leads to more robust findings.

Conclusions:

  • Integrating mixed methods research is essential for addressing complex quality and safety problems.
  • A deliberate focus on integration throughout the research process improves study quality.
  • Effective integration enables better answers to complex problems, advancing patient safety and care quality.