Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2025

Author Spotlight: A 3D Digital Model for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Nodules
Published on: May 19, 2023
Absolute ground truth-based validation of computer-aided nodule detection and volumetry in low-dose CT imaging
Louise D'hondt1, Pieter-Jan Kellens2, Kwinten Torfs3
1Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Proeftuinstraat 86, Ghent, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Purpose:
To validate the performance of computer-aided detection (CAD) and volumetry software using an anthropomorphic phantom with a ground truth (GT) set of 3D-printed nodules.
Methods:
The Kyoto Kaguku Lungman phantom, containing 3D-printed solid nodules including six diameters (4 to 9 mm) and three morphologies (smooth, lobulated, spiculated), was scanned at varying CTDIvol levels (6.04, 1.54 and 0.20 mGy). Combinations of reconstruction algorithms (iterative and deep learning image reconstruction) and kernels (soft and hard) were applied. Detection, volumetry and density results recorded by a commercially available AI-based algorithm (AVIEW LCS + ) were compared to the absolute GT, which was determined through µCT scanning at 50 µm resolution. The associations between image acquisition parameters or nodule characteristics and accuracy of nodule detection and characterization were analyzed with chi square tests and multiple linear regression.
Results:
High levels of detection sensitivity and precision (minimal 83 % and 91 % respectively) were observed across all acquisitions. Neither reconstruction algorithm nor radiation dose showed significant associations with detection. Nodule diameter however showed a highly significant association with detection (p < 0.0001). Volumetric measurements for nodules > 6 mm were accurate within 10 % absolute range from volumeGT, regardless of dose and reconstruction. Nodule diameter and morphology are major determinants of volumetric accuracy (p < 0.001). Density assignment was not significantly influenced by any parameters.
Conclusions:
Our study confirms the software's accurate performance in nodule volumetry, detection and density characterization with robustness for variations in CT imaging protocols. This study suggests the incorporation of similar phantom setups in quality assurance of CAD tools.

