THE ROLE OF DISTAL LOCKING IN INTRAMEDULLARY NAILS FOR HIP FRACTURE FIXATION: A REVIEW OF CURRENT LITERATURE

Traditionally, it was believed that both proximal and distal locking are essential for achieving stability during intra-medullary fixation for extra-capsular hip fractures. However, recent literature has presented varying perspectives on the necessity of distal locking. Distal locking plays a significant role in managing hip fractures with uncertainties regarding longitudinal and rotational stability. This includes cases of comminuted intertrochanteric fractures with subtrochanteric extension, reverse oblique and high oblique fractures, broad medullary canals, comminution of the lateral wall, diaphyseal fractures, and large posteromedial fragments extending below the level of the lesser trochanter. In stable pertrochanteric fractures, with the lag screw passing through the lateral cortex of the distal fragment, may not require a distal locking screw. Distal locking has been associated with potential complications, including irritation of the fascia lata, prolonged operation time, increased radiation exposure, greater blood loss, implant loosening, secondary femoral stress fractures, and damage to the femoral artery. Thus, although distal locking is of doubtful significance in stable pertrochanteric fractures it is essential in unstable fracture patterns.