Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

23.0K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Identifying ethical issues in stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials to inform the Ottawa Statement update: a systematic review of trials published 2016-2022.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2025
Same author

Gaps in the Ottawa Statement on the Ethical Design and Conduct of Cluster Randomized Trials: a citation analysis reveals a need for updated ethics guidelines.

Research integrity and peer review·2025
Same author

Ethical challenges in research on sexual dysfunction.

Bioethics·2023
Same author

Ethical and practical considerations related to data sharing when collecting patient-reported outcomes in care-based child health research.

Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation·2023
Same author

SARS-CoV-2 challenge studies: ethics and risk minimisation.

Journal of medical ethics·2020
Same author

What risks should be permissible in controlled human infection model studies?

Bioethics·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2025

A Pediatric Concussion Model in Mice: Closed Head Injury with Long-Term Disorders (CHILD)
07:01

A Pediatric Concussion Model in Mice: Closed Head Injury with Long-Term Disorders (CHILD)

Published on: February 7, 2025

389

Should Children Be Included in Human Challenge Studies?

Ariella Binik1

  • 1Associate professor of philosophy at McMaster University.

Ethics & Human Research
|April 17, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Pediatric human challenge studies present ethical dilemmas. This research argues against both excluding and including children, advocating for a cautious approach and a strong presumption against their participation in such vital research.

Keywords:
bioethicshuman challenge studieshuman subjects researchpediatric challenge studies

More Related Videos

A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research
08:42

A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research

Published on: July 31, 2017

8.2K
Measuring Cardiac Autonomic Nervous System ANS Activity in Toddlers - Resting and Developmental Challenges
08:22

Measuring Cardiac Autonomic Nervous System ANS Activity in Toddlers - Resting and Developmental Challenges

Published on: February 25, 2016

15.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2025

A Pediatric Concussion Model in Mice: Closed Head Injury with Long-Term Disorders (CHILD)
07:01

A Pediatric Concussion Model in Mice: Closed Head Injury with Long-Term Disorders (CHILD)

Published on: February 7, 2025

389
A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research
08:42

A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research

Published on: July 31, 2017

8.2K
Measuring Cardiac Autonomic Nervous System ANS Activity in Toddlers - Resting and Developmental Challenges
08:22

Measuring Cardiac Autonomic Nervous System ANS Activity in Toddlers - Resting and Developmental Challenges

Published on: February 25, 2016

15.5K

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Pediatric Research
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Human challenge studies intentionally expose participants to pathogens for scientific advancement.
  • Ethical debates persist regarding the inclusion of children in these studies.
  • Recent guidance suggests potential ethical permissibility for pediatric human challenge studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the ethical justifications for and against including children in human challenge studies.
  • To propose a nuanced ethical framework for pediatric human challenge research.
  • To establish guidelines for the ethical review of pediatric human challenge studies.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of existing ethical arguments for and against pediatric participation.
  • Drawing parallels with ethical considerations in Phase I clinical trials for children.
  • Developing an age de-escalation approach to research participation.
  • Proposing a procedural framework for ethics review.

Main Results:

  • Rejection of common arguments for the exclusion of children.
  • Identification of pediatric human challenge studies as a complex ethical research category requiring caution.
  • Establishment of a strong presumption against the inclusion of children based on necessity and vulnerability.

Conclusions:

  • Neither blanket exclusion nor inclusion of children in human challenge studies is ethically well-justified.
  • A cautious, necessity-driven approach is required, prioritizing children's vulnerability.
  • A structured ethics review process is essential for any proposed pediatric human challenge studies.