Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2025

Determination of the Mechanical Properties of Flexible Connectors for Use in Insulated Concrete Wall Panels
Published on: October 19, 2022
Effective Prediction of Concrete Constitutive Models for Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls under Cyclic Loading
Quoc Bao To1, Jiuk Shin2, Sung Jig Kim3
1Deep Learning Architecture Research Center, Department of Architectural Engineering, Sejong University, 209 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea.
Abstract:
One of the most challenging elements of modeling the behaviour of reinforced concrete (RC) walls is combining realistic material models that can capture the observable behaviour of the physical system. Experiments with realistic loading rates and pressures reveal that steel and concrete display complicated nonlinear behaviour that is challenging to represent in a single constitutive model. To investigate the response of a reinforced concrete structure subjected to dynamic loads, this paper's study is based on many different material models to assess the advantages and disadvantages of the models on 2D and 3D RC walls using the LS-DYNA program. The models consisted of the KCC model and the CDP model, which represented plasticity and distinct tensile/compressive damage models, and the Winfrith model, which represented plasticity and the smeared crack model. Subsequently, the models' performances were assessed by comparing them to experimental data from reinforced concrete structures, in order to validate the accuracy of the overall behaviour prediction. The Winfrith model demonstrated satisfactory results in predicting the behaviour of 2D and 3D walls, including maximum strength, stiffness deterioration, and energy dissipation. The method accurately predicted the maximum strength of the Winfrith concrete model for the 2D wall with an error of 9.24% and for the 3D wall with errors of 3.28% in the X direction and 5.02% in the Y direction. The Winfrith model demonstrated higher precision in predicting dissipation energy for the 3D wall in both the X and Y directions, with errors of 6.84% and 6.62%, correspondingly. Additional parametric analyses were carried out to investigate structural behaviour, taking into account variables such as concrete strength, strain rate, mesh size, and the influence of the element type.
Related Concept Videos
Behavior of Concrete Under Compressive Load
As the concrete specimen fractures under...
Elasticity in Concrete
Fatigue Strength of Concrete
Creep in Concrete
Dynamic Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete
The sonic test is a common method to determine the dynamic modulus. In this test, a concrete beam, sized either 6 x 6 x 30 inches or 4 x 4 x 20 inches, is clamped at its center. Vibrations are initiated at one end of the beam by an electromagnetic exciter unit powered by...
Yield Criteria for Ductile Materials under Plane Stress
The Maximum Shearing Stress Criterion, also known as...

