Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sample Size Calculation01:19

Sample Size Calculation

3.3K
Knowledge of the sample size is the first requirement to conduct random sampling or an experiment. The sample size is the total number of units, observations, or groups (in some cases) used to get the data to estimate a population parameter. As the name suggests, the sample size is that of the sample drawn from the population and differs from the population size.
The sample size for the given experiment or sampling effort is fundamental to any study design. Sample size decides the number of...
3.3K
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

5.8K
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
5.8K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

3.3K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
3.3K
Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

11.9K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
11.9K
Sampling Plans01:23

Sampling Plans

181
Sampling is a crucial step in analytical chemistry, allowing researchers to collect representative data from a large population. Common sampling methods include random, judgmental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling.
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
181
Stratified Sampling Method01:16

Stratified Sampling Method

12.0K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
12.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ivermectin for Critically and Noncritically Ill Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: Randomized, Embedded, Multifactorial Adaptive Platform Trial for Community-Acquired Pneumonia (REMAP-CAP).

Critical care medicine·2026
Same author

Wastewater Surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 in Rural Kentucky, 2021-2023.

Viruses·2026
Same author

Intermediate dose heparin thromboprophylaxis among critically ill patients with COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2026
Same author

Enabling SARS-CoV-2 Wastewater Surveillance Using an Integrated Microfluidic Chip.

Analytical chemistry·2025
Same author

Pridopidine in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: The HEALEY ALS Platform Trial.

JAMA·2025
Same author

Single-cell delineation of strain-specific HIV-1 Vif activities using dual reporter sensor cells and live cell imaging.

Journal of virology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 27, 2025

Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot
07:11

Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot

Published on: January 7, 2019

34.5K

Optimal sample size division in two-stage seamless designs.

Lindsay R Berry1, Joe Marion1, Scott M Berry1,2

  • 1Berry Consultants, LLC, Austin, Texas, USA.

Pharmaceutical Statistics
|April 27, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Seamless phase 2/3 clinical trial designs offer greater power and robustness compared to separate trials. Optimal seamless designs are more adaptable across various response scenarios, providing practical guidance for implementation.

Keywords:
multiple testingseamless phase 2/3 trialtreatment selection

More Related Videos

A Workflow for Lipid Nanoparticle LNP Formulation Optimization using Designed Mixture-Process Experiments and Self-Validated Ensemble Models SVEM
13:54

A Workflow for Lipid Nanoparticle LNP Formulation Optimization using Designed Mixture-Process Experiments and Self-Validated Ensemble Models SVEM

Published on: August 18, 2023

4.5K
Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
20:24

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study

Published on: January 31, 2014

16.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 27, 2025

Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot
07:11

Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot

Published on: January 7, 2019

34.5K
A Workflow for Lipid Nanoparticle LNP Formulation Optimization using Designed Mixture-Process Experiments and Self-Validated Ensemble Models SVEM
13:54

A Workflow for Lipid Nanoparticle LNP Formulation Optimization using Designed Mixture-Process Experiments and Self-Validated Ensemble Models SVEM

Published on: August 18, 2023

4.5K
Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
20:24

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study

Published on: January 31, 2014

16.5K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Biostatistics
  • Drug Development

Background:

  • Seamless phase 2/3 designs are gaining traction in clinical research.
  • Understanding their benefits over separate phase 2 and phase 3 trials is crucial.
  • Design choices, like patient allocation to phase 2, impact trial outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of seamless phase 2/3 designs against separate phase 2 and phase 3 trials.
  • To evaluate the impact of varying patient proportions in the phase 2 portion of seamless designs.
  • To identify optimal design strategies for clinical trials.

Main Methods:

  • A simulation study was conducted across multiple trial arms and efficacy response curves.
  • The study compared separate trial designs with seamless phase 2/3 designs.
  • Patient allocation proportions for phase 2 (0%-100%) were systematically varied.

Main Results:

  • Seamless designs demonstrated superior statistical power compared to separate trial designs.
  • Optimal seamless designs exhibited greater robustness across diverse response scenarios.
  • A phase 2 patient allocation range of 30%-50% proved nearly optimal for seamless trials.
  • Separate trial designs showed less adaptability, with optimal percentages varying significantly across scenarios.

Conclusions:

  • Seamless phase 2/3 trials provide superior performance and robustness when operationally and scientifically feasible.
  • The findings offer practical guidance for selecting optimal patient allocation in seamless trial designs.
  • Seamless designs represent an efficient advancement over traditional separate phase 2 and phase 3 trials.