Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2025

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
When is a Health Practitioner Not "a Fit and Proper Person" to Practise Their Health Profession in Australia?
1Adjunct Professor at La Trobe University School of Law.
Abstract:
Prior to implementation of the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Act 2009 (Qld) (National Law) the term "good character" was used in the statutory regulation of health practitioners in Australia. "Good character" has been jettisoned in the National Law and replaced with the concept of "fit and proper person". The term "fit and proper person" plays an important role in the regulation of health practitioners under the National Law. "Fit and proper person" is not defined in the National Law but case law has narrowed the term to refer to "moral integrity" and "rectitude of character". These considerations can be applied in the context of application for registration, immediate action, and disciplinary proceedings in relevant tribunals. Application of the "fit and proper person" test serves to enhance public confidence in the integrity of the health professions and the integrity of the regulatory regime, as distinct from protecting the public from unsafe and incompetent health professionals.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Ethical Standards II
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy...
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities II
Communication between nurses and...
Torts III
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
Torts II
Obedience

