Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2025

Author Spotlight: Scope of LE-ULBD as a Safe, Effective, and Minimally Invasive Approach to Treat Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Published on: February 9, 2024
Unplanned Surgery in Dually Eligible Beneficiaries for Conditions that Should Be Treated Electively
Shukri H A Dualeh1,2, Sidra N Bonner1,2, Nicholas J Kunnath2
1University of Michigan, Department of Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI.
Objective:
To evaluate the rate of unplanned surgery among dually eligible beneficiaries for surgical conditions that should be treated electively.
Summary Background Data:
Access-sensitive surgical conditions (eg, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, colectomy for colon cancer, and ventral hernia repair) are ideally treated with elective surgery, but when left untreated have a natural history leading to unplanned surgery. Dually eligible beneficiaries may face systematic barriers to accessing surgical care.
Methods:
Cross-sectional retrospective study of all beneficiaries who were eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid and underwent surgery for an access-sensitive surgical condition between 2016 and 2020. We compared the rate of unplanned surgery as well as 30-day mortality, complications, and readmissions for dually eligible versus non-dually eligible beneficiaries. Gender, age, race/ethnicity, comorbidities, teaching status, nursing ratio, hospital region and bed size, and surgery year were included in the risk-adjustment model.
Results:
Out of 853,500 beneficiaries, 118,812 were dually eligible, with an average age (SD) of 75.2(7.7) years. Compared with nondually eligible beneficiaries, dually eligible beneficiaries had higher rates of unplanned surgery for access-sensitive surgical conditions (45.1% vs. 31.8%, P <0.001), 30-day mortality (2.9% vs. 2.6%, aOR=1.10 (1.07-1.14), P <0.001), complications (23.6% vs. 20.1%, aOR=1.23 (1.20-1.25), P <0.001), and 30-day readmissions (15.5% vs. 12.9%, aOR=1.24 (1.22-1.27), P <0.001). These differences narrowed significantly when evaluating elective procedures only.
Conclusions:
Dually eligible beneficiaries were more likely to undergo unplanned surgery for access-sensitive surgical conditions, leading to worse rates of mortality, complications, and readmissions. Our findings suggest that improving rates of elective surgery for these conditions represents an actionable target to narrow the difference in postoperative outcomes between dually eligible and non-dually eligible beneficiaries.
More Related Videos
11:58Minimally Invasive Thumb-sized Pterional Craniotomy for Surgical Clip Ligation of Unruptured Anterior Circulation Aneurysms
Published on: August 11, 2015
07:36Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration in Patients with a Previous History of Biliary Tract Surgery
Published on: February 10, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...
Secondary Healthcare System
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD: