Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2025

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
Published on: January 24, 2020
Early-Life Circumstances and Racial Disparities in Cognition Among Older Adults in the US
Zhuoer Lin1, Justin Ye2, Heather Allore3,4,5,6
1Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
Importance:
Given the critical role of neurocognitive development in early life, understanding the association between early-life circumstances and racial disparities in cognition has important implications.
Objective:
To assess whether racial differences in early-life circumstances are collectively and individually associated with racial disparities in late-life cognition among older adults in the US.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
This cross-sectional study used comprehensive life history data from the Health and Retirement Study, a nationally representative survey of US adults 50 years or older. Data analyses were performed from August 9, 2022, to January 20, 2024.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
Racial differences in early-life circumstances and racial disparities in late-life cognition were investigated using a Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition regression model. Cognitive outcomes, including cognitive score and cognitive impairment, were evaluated using the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status. Early-life educational experiences were primary explanatory variables; early-life cohort, regional, financial, health, trauma, family relationship factors, and educational attainment were additional explanatory variables; demographic and genetic factors were covariates.
Results:
The study sample comprised 9015 participants; 1634 non-Hispanic Black (hereafter, Black) individuals (18.1%) and 7381 non-Hispanic White (hereafter, White) individuals (81.9%). Among Black participants, the mean (SD) age was 69.2 (9.2) years and 1094 (67.0%) were women. Among White participants, the mean (SD) age was 73.2 (10.1) years and 4410 (59.7%) were women. Cognitive scores (scale, 0-27) were significantly lower among Black participants (13.5 [95% CI, 13.3-13.7] points) than among White participants (15.8 [95% CI, 15.7-15.9] points), while the prevalence of cognitive impairment (cognitive score <12) was significantly higher among Black participants (33.6 [95% CI, 31.3-35.9] percentage points [ppt]) than among White participants (16.4 [95% CI, 15.6-17.2] ppt). Substantial racial differences were observed in early-life circumstances. Overall, differences in early-life circumstances were associated with 61.5% of the racial disparities in cognitive score (1.4 [95% CI, 0.88-2.0] points), and 82.3% of the racial disparities in cognitive impairment (14.2 [95% CI, 8.8-19.5] ppt), respectively. In multivariable analyses, early-life educational experiences were associated with 35.2% of the disparities in cognitive score and 48.6% in cognitive impairment. Notably, school racial segregation (all segregated schooling before college) was associated with 28.8% to 39.7% of the racial disparities in cognition. These findings were consistent in a series of sensitivity analyses.
Conclusions And Relevance:
The findings of this cross-sectional study suggest that less favorable early-life circumstances are associated with clinically meaningful racial disparities in late-life cognition. Policies that improve educational equity have the potential to reduce racial disparities in cognition in older ages. Clinicians may leverage early-life circumstances to promote the screening, prevention, and interventions of cognitive impairment more efficiently, thereby promoting health equity.
Related Concept Videos
Cognitive Development During Adulthood
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Language and Cognition
Biological Influences on Intelligence
Information Processing Approach
Cognitivism
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process...

