Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2025

A Data-Driven Approach to Quantifying Immune States in Sepsis
Published on: February 7, 2025
Exploring the Big Data Paradox for various estimands using vaccination data from the global COVID-19 Trends and
Youqi Yang1, Walter Dempsey1, Peisong Han2
1Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Abstract:
Selection bias poses a substantial challenge to valid statistical inference in nonprobability samples. This study compared estimates of the first-dose COVID-19 vaccination rates among Indian adults in 2021 from a large nonprobability sample, the COVID-19 Trends and Impact Survey (CTIS), and a small probability survey, the Center for Voting Options and Trends in Election Research (CVoter), against national benchmark data from the COVID Vaccine Intelligence Network. Notably, CTIS exhibits a larger estimation error on average (0.37) compared to CVoter (0.14). Additionally, we explored the accuracy (regarding mean squared error) of CTIS in estimating successive differences (over time) and subgroup differences (for females versus males) in mean vaccine uptakes. Compared to the overall vaccination rates, targeting these alternative estimands comparing differences or relative differences in two means increased the effective sample size. These results suggest that the Big Data Paradox can manifest in countries beyond the United States and may not apply equally to every estimand of interest.
Related Concept Videos
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Types of Skewness
For instance, in the middle of a pandemic, the geographical distribution of vaccine coverage may be positively skewed towards populations in the global north countries. However,...
Causality in Epidemiology
Estimating Population Standard Deviation

