Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2025

Measuring the Carotid to Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Cf-PWV to Evaluate Arterial Stiffness
Published on: May 3, 2018
Assessing pressure wave components for aortic stiffness monitoring through spectral regression learning
Arian Aghilinejad1, Morteza Gharib1
1Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E California Blvd, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Aims:
The ageing process notably induces structural changes in the arterial system, primarily manifesting as increased aortic stiffness, a precursor to cardiovascular events. While wave separation analysis is a robust tool for decomposing the components of blood pressure waveform, its relationship with cardiovascular events, such as aortic stiffening, is incompletely understood. Furthermore, its applicability has been limited due to the need for concurrent measurements of pressure and flow. Our aim in this study addresses this gap by introducing a spectral regression learning method for pressure-only wave separation analysis.
Methods And Results:
Leveraging data from the Framingham Heart Study (2640 individuals, 55% women), we evaluate the accuracy of pressure-only estimates, their interchangeability with a reference method based on ultrasound-derived flow waves, and their association with carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV). Method-derived estimates are strongly correlated with the reference ones for forward wave amplitude ( ), backward wave amplitude ( ), and reflection index ( ) and moderately correlated with a time delay between forward and backward waves ( ). The proposed pressure-only method shows interchangeability with the reference method through covariate analysis. Adjusting for age, sex, body size, mean blood pressure, and heart rate, the results suggest that both pressure-only and pressure-flow evaluations of wave separation parameters yield similar model performances for predicting carotid-femoral PWV, with forward wave amplitude being the only significant factor (P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval, 0.056-0.097).
Conclusion:
We propose an interchangeable pressure-only wave separation analysis method and demonstrate its clinical applicability in capturing aortic stiffening. The proposed method provides a valuable non-invasive tool for assessing cardiovascular health.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Pulse
The pulse serves as a clinical...

