Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2025

Skeletal Muscle Gender Dimorphism from Proteomics
Published on: December 14, 2011
Paradoxical gender effects in meat consumption across cultures
Christopher J Hopwood1, Jahn N Zizer2, Adam T Nissen3
1University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. chopwoodmsu@gmail.com.
Abstract:
Men tend to eat more meat than women, but it is not clear why. We tested three hypotheses in a cross-cultural design (20,802 individuals in 23 countries across four continents): that gender differences are (a) universal, (b) related to gender roles and thus weaker in countries with higher gender equality and human development, or (c) related to opportunities to express gender roles and thus stronger in countries with higher gender equality and human development. Across all countries, men tended to consume more meat than women. However, this difference increased significantly in countries with greater human development and gender equality. The paradoxical gender gap in meat consumption aligns with previous research that suggests greater differences in behavior across genders in contexts that are more developed and gender equal. We discuss implications for theories of culture and gender as well as practical implications for global meat reduction.
Related Concept Videos
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Confirmation Biases
Mate Choice
Social Proof

