Examining Inclusive Language in Clinical Narratives in Medical Biochemistry Textbooks to Model Equitable...

When healthcare professionals use biased or stigmatizing language to describe people or conditions, it can impact the quality of care or erode the patient-physician relationship. It is not clear where healthcare professionals acquire biased and stigmatizing language in practice. This study focuses on examining language in educational materials used in training of medical students. Specifically, medical biochemistry textbooks were examined as they are often a first exposure to clinical narratives and communication standards. The aim of this project is to investigate whether medical biochemistry textbooks, widely recommended in preclinical UME, model inclusive language communication in clinical narratives.

To determine if educational materials follow inclusive writing guidelines, we conducted a modified document analysis on a sample of medical biochemistry textbooks when clinical scenarios were described. Three independent researchers separately reviewed the textbooks, coded the language using NVivo, and generated themes.

Our results show that medical biochemistry textbooks contain language which is not in alignment with the best practices for inclusive language. Our analysis mapped codes to two primary themes of language misalignment. The first theme, "clinical language" (n = 92), included the following codes: difficult patient, general negative descriptive language, patient as failure, and questioning patient credibility. The second primary theme, "identity-first labeling" (n = 251), included 21 codes.

This study provides early evidence that the language used in medical biochemistry textbooks to describe people and conditions is not in alignment with inclusive language recommendations. This can reinforce the way future healthcare professionals speak to and about their patients.