Andragogic Improvements in Radiation Safety Training

At the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), many diagnostic and therapeutic procedures involving radioactive materials or radiation-producing machines are performed daily. A growing number of minor but preventable incidents related to radiation safety have brought up concerns related to the effectiveness of the training program. A comprehensive literature review was performed to summarize post-COVID insights into andragogic online training practices, statistical analyses, and overall retention competencies in radiation safety. Andragogic research shows that the best method of training adult learners is controlled simulation that tests critical thinking and problem-solving capabilities, drawing upon previous knowledge or experiences. A new training curriculum based on these andragogic principles was designed and administered to a subgroup of UAB radiation workers. Scores from pre-testing and post-testing were collected and analyzed. An ANCOVA was used to account for differences in the pre-test scores between the control and experimental groups, which was found to be statistically significant (p = 0.018), suggesting that small changes in a radiation safety training program can have significant impacts in retention of key information.