Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2026

Image-guided Convection-enhanced Delivery into Agarose Gel Models of the Brain
Published on: May 14, 2014
Air inflow into vacuum-type immobilization devices impacts setup errors.
Fumiyasu Matsubayashi1, Tatsuya Kamima2, Yasushi Ito2
1Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-Ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan. fumiyasu.matsubayashi@jfcr.or.jp.
Weekly deflation of vacuum-type immobilization devices (VIDs) significantly reduces setup errors in head and neck cancer radiotherapy. This improves patient setup reproducibility by maintaining consistent pressure within the VIDs.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Vacuum-type immobilization devices (VIDs) are crucial for patient positioning in radiotherapy.
- Maintaining consistent pressure within VIDs is essential for accurate patient setup.
- Air inflow can lead to pressure fluctuations, potentially increasing setup errors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effect of air inflow into VIDs on setup errors during radiotherapy.
- To compare setup errors between patients with weekly deflated VIDs and those with non-deflated VIDs.
- To assess the relationship between VID pressure changes and setup accuracy.
Main Methods:
- Seventy head and neck cancer patients were divided into two groups: weekly VIDs deflation (Group V) and no deflation (Group N).
- Systematic errors (Σ) and random errors (σ) were calculated for each patient.
- Overall means (μ) and standard deviations (SDoverall) of setup errors were compared between groups.
- Temporary pressure changes within VIDs were monitored.
Main Results:
- While overall means (μ) were similar (within 0.20 mm and 0.2°), SDoverall significantly differed between groups.
- Group V showed lower SDoverall (0.58°) compared to Group N (0.87°) in the Roll axes.
- Systematic (Σ) and random (σ) errors were consistently lower across all axes in Group V.
- Weekly deflation maintained VID pressure around -20 kPa, whereas non-deflated VIDs pressure increased to -5 kPa.
Conclusions:
- Effective pressure control in VIDs through weekly deflation reduces patient-to-patient variation.
- Regular VIDs deflation enhances setup reproducibility for individual patients.
- This leads to smaller variations in overall setup errors, improving treatment accuracy.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Static, Stagnation, Dynamic and Total Pressure
Laminar Flow
Pipe Flowrate Measurement
The orifice meter is a simple,...
General External Flow Characteristics

