Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

191
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
191
Accuracy, limits, and approximation01:28

Accuracy, limits, and approximation

445
Accuracy, limits, and approximations are common in many fields, especially in engineering calculations. These concepts are imperative for ensuring that a given value is as close as possible to its true value.
Accuracy is defined as the closeness of the measured value to the true or actual value. In engineering mechanics, repeated measurements are taken during theoretical or experimental analyses to ensure that the result is precise and accurate.
The accuracy of any solution is based on the...
445
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

73.6K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
73.6K
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

2.4K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
2.4K
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

8.8K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate...
8.8K
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

6.6K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
6.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Do Cooking Classes for Nutrition Students Improve Their Eating Competence and Cooking Skills? A 1-Year Follow-Up in a Sample of Brazilian Public University Students.

Nutrients·2026
Same author

Cultural Adaptation and Reliability Testing of the Coeliac Disease Food Attitudes and Behaviours Scale in Brazil.

Nutrients·2026
Same author

Adaptation of the Child Coeliac Disease Food Attitudes and Behaviours Scale (Child CD-FAB) into Brazilian Portuguese: Translation and Evaluation of Reproducibility and Internal Consistency.

Nutrients·2025
Same author

Consumption patterns and eating behaviors of schoolchildren associated with mental health problems: a Brazilian nationwide study.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Food Neophobia in Brazilian Children: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study Comparing Neurodivergent and Neurotypical Children with and Without Dietary Restrictions.

Nutrients·2025
Same author

Food Neophobia: A Common Challenge Among Brazilian Children with Down Syndrome.

Nutrients·2025
Same journal

Research on a Regional Availability Evaluation Model for Road-Area High-Entropy Energy Based on Synergy Factors.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Atmospheric Turbulence Channel Modeling and Performance Analysis of a CO-ZP-OFDM Coherent Optical Communication System for UAV Air-to-Ground Scenarios.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Information Geometry and Asymptotic Theory for SMML Estimators.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Correlation Entropy and Power-Law Kinetics.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Research on the Contagion of Systemic Financial Risk Under the Impact of Climate Risks-From the Perspective of Complex Networks and Machine Learning.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

The Statistical-Mechanical Meaning of the Wave Function of Quantum Mechanics.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.3K

A Bayesian Measure of Model Accuracy.

Gabriel Hideki Vatanabe Brunello1, Eduardo Yoshio Nakano1

  • 1Department of Statistics, University of Brasília, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, Asa Norte, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)
|June 26, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new accuracy measure for probabilistic models to ensure accurate predictions and better decision-making. The proposed Bayesian method offers a clear criterion for evaluating and rejecting inadequate statistical models.

Keywords:
Bayesian inferencecredible intervalgoodness of fitregression models

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.5K
Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.3K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.5K
Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.5K

Area of Science:

  • Statistical Modeling
  • Bayesian Inference
  • Predictive Accuracy Assessment

Background:

  • Accurate probabilistic models are crucial for reliable decision-making in statistical modeling.
  • Current model comparison methods may not ensure optimal predictive model selection.
  • Assessing predictive accuracy is vital as models are often used for new observations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a novel accuracy measure for evaluating a statistical model's predictive capability.
  • To provide a straightforward measure with a decision criterion for model rejection.
  • To demonstrate the application and practicality of the proposed measure using real-world data.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a new accuracy measure from a Bayesian perspective.
  • Elucidation of underlying concepts and procedures for applying the measure.
  • Application of the proposed methodology to real-world datasets.

Main Results:

  • The proposed accuracy measure offers a clear and understandable way to evaluate predictive ability.
  • The measure includes a practical decision criterion for identifying and rejecting inadequate models.
  • Application to real-world data demonstrated the methodology's feasibility and utility.

Conclusions:

  • The developed accuracy measure enhances the evaluation of probabilistic models' predictive performance.
  • The Bayesian approach provides a robust framework for assessing model fit and aiding model selection.
  • The proposed method offers a valuable tool for improving the reliability of statistical modeling in practical applications.