Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Simple and rapid methods for bacterial identifications.

A L Barry

    Clinics in Laboratory Medicine
    |March 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study details simple, inexpensive methods for quickly identifying common bacterial pathogens. These rapid bacterial identification techniques save time and resources in clinical microbiology.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Something New-Nitric Acid a Remedy for Stings and Poisons.

    The Southern medical record·2022
    Same author

    Cefuroxime, an in vitro Comparison with Six Other Cephalosporins.

    Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine·2010
    Same author

    Ceftazidime, a pseudomonas-active cephalosporin: in-vitro antimicrobial activity evaluation including recommendations for disc diffusion susceptibility tests.

    The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy·2009
    Same author

    Precision and accuracy of fluconazole susceptibility testing by broth microdilution, Etest, and disk diffusion methods.

    Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy·2002
    Same author

    Standardization of broth microdilution and disk diffusion susceptibility tests for Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae and Haemophilus somnus: quality control standards for ceftiofur, enrofloxacin, florfenicol, gentamicin, penicillin, tetracycline, tilmicosin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

    Journal of clinical microbiology·2001
    Same author

    Evaluation of daptomycin susceptibility testing by Etest and the effect of different batches of media.

    The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy·2001
    Same journal

    Advances in Hemostasis Laboratory Testing.

    Clinics in laboratory medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Extracellular Vesicles in Hemostasis.

    Clinics in laboratory medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Thrombin Generation Assay: Ready for Prime Time.

    Clinics in laboratory medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Viscoelastic Testing for the Laboratorian: Recent Advances and Practical Advice.

    Clinics in laboratory medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Practical Recommendations for Harmonization of Hemostasis Testing Across Hospital Sites.

    Clinics in laboratory medicine·2026
    Same journal

    The Role of Hypoxia in Vascular Endothelial Dysfunction and Venous Thromboembolism.

    Clinics in laboratory medicine·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Clinical Microbiology
    • Bacteriology
    • Diagnostic Science

    Background:

    • Accurate and timely identification of bacterial pathogens is crucial for effective patient treatment and infection control.
    • Traditional bacterial identification methods can be time-consuming and costly, delaying appropriate clinical decisions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To present simple, inexpensive, and rapid procedures for the identification of common bacterial pathogens.
    • To enable clinical laboratories to identify most bacterial isolates quickly and efficiently.

    Main Methods:

    • Detailed description of straightforward diagnostic protocols.
    • Application of judicious testing strategies for bacterial identification.
    • Focus on cost-effective and time-efficient laboratory techniques.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Successful identification of most common bacterial pathogens within minutes to hours.
    • Clear recognition of bacterial strains requiring further, more extensive identification procedures.
    • Validation of the practicality and efficiency of the outlined methods.

    Conclusions:

    • The presented simple and inexpensive procedures allow for rapid bacterial identification.
    • Judicious application of these methods enhances diagnostic efficiency in clinical microbiology labs.
    • These techniques facilitate quicker clinical decisions by reducing thời gian to identification.