Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.4K
Attribution Theory00:56

Attribution Theory

12.9K
Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).
12.9K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

12.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.8K
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K
The Behavioral Perspective on Personality01:19

The Behavioral Perspective on Personality

318
Behaviorists view personality as primarily shaped by environmental reinforcements and consequences. According to this perspective, behavior is influenced by external stimuli, and individuals adjust their actions based on rewards and punishments. Over time, learning histories — accumulated patterns of reinforcement — play a significant role in shaping personality. Behaviors that lead to positive outcomes are reinforced, while those resulting in negative outcomes are diminished.
318
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

60.4K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
60.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How AI Systems Can Be Blameworthy.

Philosophia (Ramat-Gan, Israel)·2024
Same author

Responsibility, Free Will, and the Concept of Basic Desert.

Philosophical studies·2023
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 22, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.7K

On the Top-Down Argument for the Ability to Do Otherwise.

Leonhard Menges1

  • 1Department of Philosophy (GW), Salzburg University, Kapitelgasse 4-6, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.

Erkenntnis
|July 5, 2024
PubMed
Summary

The Top-Down Argument for free will suggests humans can do otherwise, but this paper finds it insufficient. It fails to prove this ability is relevant for free will debates, even with scientific theories.

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Mind
  • Metaphysics
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • The concept of 'ability to do otherwise' is central to free will discussions.
  • The Top-Down Argument attempts to establish this ability using scientific theories.
  • Existing arguments may not sufficiently bridge the gap between scientific findings and the philosophical requirements for free will.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the Top-Down Argument for the ability to do otherwise.
  • To determine if the argument successfully establishes the sense of 'ability to do otherwise' relevant to free will.
  • To explore the limitations of scientific theories in supporting libertarian free will.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of the Top-Down Argument's premises and conclusion.

More Related Videos

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

25.2K
Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
11:54

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

4.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 22, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.7K
Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

25.2K
Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
11:54

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

4.3K
  • Examination of scientific theories of human action and their implications for agency.
  • Logical assessment of the argument's validity and soundness in relation to free will debates.

    • Main Results:

    • The Top-Down Argument successfully demonstrates that humans can do otherwise in *some* sense.
    • However, the argument fails to establish that this ability is the specific kind required for free will.
    • Attempts to strengthen the argument by refining its premises were found to be unsuccessful.

    Conclusions:

    • The Top-Down Argument, as presented, is insufficient to establish the free will-relevant ability to do otherwise.
    • Current scientific theories, while presupposing some form of alternative possibilities, may not satisfy the stringent requirements of free will.
    • Further philosophical and scientific inquiry is needed to reconcile the ability to do otherwise with free will.