Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2025

Employing the Forced Oscillation Technique for the Assessment of Respiratory Mechanics in Adults
Published on: February 9, 2022
Respiratory muscular strength in children with mucopolysacaridosis: comparison with predictive equations
Bárbara Bernardo Figueirêdo1,2, Cyda Reinaux1, Taylline G Oliveira1
1Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of Pernambuco, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Insights
Children with mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) have significantly lower maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP and MEP) than healthy children. Reference equations for healthy children are not suitable for MPS patients; longitudinal monitoring of absolute pressures is recommended.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Pulmonology
- Rare Diseases
- Metabolic Disorders
Background:
- Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) are rare genetic metabolic disorders.
- These conditions often lead to impaired respiratory function and potential respiratory failure.
- Maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP and MEP) are key indicators of respiratory muscle strength.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare MIP and MEP in children with MPS against predicted values for healthy children.
- To evaluate the applicability of existing predictive equations for respiratory muscle strength in the MPS population.
- To assess respiratory muscle function in children diagnosed with MPS.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study involving 22 children with MPS and 22 healthy controls.
- Evaluation of chest deformity, MIP, and MEP using a digital manometer.
- Spirometry was performed to assess overall lung function.
- Comparison of measured MIP and MEP with five different predictive equations and a healthy control group.
- Kappa coefficient was used to assess agreement between measured and predicted respiratory muscle weakness.
Main Results:
- Children with MPS exhibited significantly lower MIP (37.14±36.23 cmH2O) and MEP (60.09±22.3 cmH2O) compared to healthy controls (MIP: 91.45±35.60; MEP: 95.73±22.38).
- Chest deformities such as pectus carinatum (45.5%) and pectus excavatum (36.4%) were prevalent in the MPS group.
- Only MEP predictive equations by Tomalak et al. showed a non-significant trend towards closeness (P=0.09) with MPS children's MEP.
- Weak agreement was found for inspiratory weakness between absolute and predicted values using Tomalak et al. and Domenèch-Clar et al. equations (k=0.35).
- Moderate agreement was observed for MEP using all predictive equations in the MPS group.
Conclusions:
- Standard reference equations for healthy children are inappropriate for normalizing MIP and MEP data in children with MPS.
- Longitudinal monitoring of absolute MIP and MEP values, alongside lung volumes, is a more appropriate approach for managing respiratory function in MPS patients.
- This study highlights the need for specialized assessment of respiratory muscle strength in pediatric MPS populations.
Background:
Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) are rare metabolic diseases that impair respiratory function leading to respiratory failure. This study aimed to compare maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP and MEP) obtained in children with MPS and compare with predicted values from previous studies involving healthy children.
Methods:
This is a cross-sectional study, in which the chest deformity was evaluated; MIP, MEP through digital manometer, and lung function through spirometry. MIP and MEP were compared with five different predict equations and with a control group of healthy children. Agreement between respiratory muscle weakness regarding absolute values of MIP and MEP in relation to predictive values by the equations included in the study were assessed by Kappa coefficient.
Results:
MPS group was composed of 22 subjects. 45.5% had pectus carinatum, 36.4% pectus excavatum, and presented lower MIP (37.14±36.23 cmH
Conclusions:
In MPS children MRP data should not be normalized using the reference equations for healthy ones, is more coherent to longitudinally follow absolute pressures and lung volumes in this group.
More Related Videos
09:37Evaluation of Respiratory Muscle Activation Using Respiratory Motor Control Assessment RMCA in Individuals with Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Published on: July 19, 2013
09:18Measurements of Motor Function and Other Clinical Outcome Parameters in Ambulant Children with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
Published on: January 12, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract II: Inspection
Chest Configuration
The chest configuration...
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
Respiratory Capacities
One key metric is the Inspiratory Capacity (IC), which represents the maximum amount of air that can be inhaled with full effort. IC is calculated by summing the tidal volume and inspiratory reserve volume, typically ranging from 2.4 to 3.6 liters.
The Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) represents the air in the...