Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

An Aquatic Microbial Metaproteomics Workflow: From Cells to Tryptic Peptides Suitable for Tandem Mass Spectrometry-based Analysis
Published on: September 15, 2015
Quenching Trypsin Is Unnecessary in Filter-Based Bottom-Up Proteomics
Quenching protease activity after protein digestion is often unnecessary in proteomics. Using protein filter-trap methods allows direct peptide labeling, enhancing efficiency and automation for mass spectrometry analysis.
Area of Science:
- Proteomics
- Mass Spectrometry
- Biochemistry
Background:
- Standard proteomics workflows require quenching enzymatic digestions to prevent protease activity, which can cause overdigestion and interfere with isotopic quantitation.
- Postdigestion acidification, a common quenching method, is incompatible with chemical and isobaric labeling strategies (e.g., TMT/iTRAQ), necessitating additional steps like buffer exchange and pH adjustment.
- These extra steps reduce sample recovery, lower throughput, and complicate automation in mass spectrometry-based proteomics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether quenching is necessary when generating peptides using protein filter-trap methods.
- To determine if direct peptide labeling is feasible after filter-trap digestion, bypassing traditional quenching steps.
- To assess the impact of eliminating quenching on sample recovery, processing time, and automation potential in proteomics.
Main Methods:
- Peptides were generated from proteins captured on filter traps.
- Trypsin activity in the eluate from filter-trap preparations was assessed.
- Direct labeling of peptides was performed without postdigestion quenching or pH adjustment.
Main Results:
- Residual trypsin activity and intact trypsin were found to be negligible in the eluate from protein filter-trap preparations.
- Direct labeling of peptides was successfully performed on enzymatic digests obtained via filter-trap methods.
- This streamlined approach improved sample recovery, increased throughput, and facilitated easier automation.
Conclusions:
- Quenching enzymatic digestions is unnecessary when using protein filter-trap methods in proteomics.
- Directly labeling peptides from filter-trap digests simplifies workflows and is compatible with chemical and isobaric labeling techniques.
- Eliminating the quenching step enhances the efficiency, recovery, and automation of mass spectrometry-based proteomics analyses.
More Related Videos
10:37Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification
Published on: November 15, 2017
11:12Organic Solvent-Based Protein Precipitation for Robust Proteome Purification Ahead of Mass Spectrometry
Published on: February 7, 2022
Related Concept Videos
In-vitro Mutagenesis
In vitro Mutagenesis
Mechanical Protein Function
The Proteasome Structure
The proteasome is an...
Overview of Protein Metabolism
Amino acids play various roles in the body once they are absorbed into cells. They are restructured...
Amino Acid Catabolism