Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2025

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
Multi-institutional experimental validation of online adaptive proton therapy workflows
Mislav Bobić1,2, Evangelia Choulilitsa1,3, Hoyeon Lee2
1Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
This study validates two online adaptive proton therapy (APT) workflows, demonstrating superior dosimetric accuracy compared to non-adaptive methods. Both adaptive approaches effectively manage anatomical variations in head-and-neck phantom treatments.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Radiotherapy Technology
Background:
- Online adaptive proton therapy (APT) aims to improve treatment accuracy by adjusting plans based on daily anatomical changes.
- Non-adaptive workflows may struggle to account for significant interfractional variations, potentially compromising dose delivery.
- Experimental validation of different online APT strategies is crucial for clinical implementation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To experimentally validate two distinct online adaptive proton therapy (APT) workflows: daily APT (DAPT_PSI) and online adaptation (OA_MGH).
- To compare the dosimetric performance of these adaptive workflows against a non-adaptive (NA) approach using Gafchromic films and OSLDs.
- To assess the ability of APT to manage interfractional anatomical variations in an anthropomorphic head-and-neck phantom.
Main Methods:
- Proton therapy plans were optimized for a head-and-neck phantom with a prescription of 2.0 Gy(RBE) per fraction.
- Four fractions were simulated with varying internal anatomy.
- Three workflows were tested: DAPT_PSI (full online replanning), OA_MGH (online adaptation of beamlet fluences), and NA (couch-shift correction).
- Dosimetric measurements were performed using Gafchromic EBT3 films and optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters (OSLDs).
Main Results:
- Both DAPT_PSI and OA_MGH demonstrated significantly higher gamma pass rates (3%/3 mm) compared to the NA workflow (91.5%-96.1% and 94.0%-95.8% vs. 67.2%-93.1%, respectively).
- OSLDs confirmed the accuracy of absolute dose calculations for all tested methods.
- OA_MGH provided improved target coverage, while DAPT_PSI offered better normal tissue sparing, particularly for the brainstem.
Conclusions:
- This multi-institutional study provides the first experimental validation of two online APT workflow concepts.
- Both adaptive strategies offer significant dosimetric advantages over non-adaptive methods in managing interfractional anatomical variations.
- Online adaptive proton therapy is essential for optimizing dose delivery in scenarios with significant patient anatomy changes.
More Related Videos
05:18Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant
Published on: October 6, 2023
07:57Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
Published on: March 24, 2022