Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test01:30

Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test

330
Gastrointestinal (GI) diagnostic studies are pivotal in confirming, ruling out, diagnosing, or staging various diseases, including cancers. Following diagnosis, allocating time for discussions with the patient and providing informational resources is crucial. Diagnostic assessments of the GI tract often occur in outpatient settings like endoscopy suites or GI labs. Preparation for these tests may include dietary restrictions, fasting, liquid bowel preparations, laxatives, enemas, and the...
330
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy01:26

Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy

72
This lesson explores three gastrointestinal imaging techniques: radionuclide testing, colonic transit studies, and virtual colonoscopy.
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and...
72

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Current Contraceptive Practices and Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Modality Preferences among Black and Non-Black Women in the United States: Implications for Bundled Messaging.

Archives of sexual behavior·2026
Same author

Misinformation About Science is a Systems-Level Dilemma.

Journal of health communication·2026
Same author

Social Context Considerations for Future HIV Vaccine Introduction and Implementation.

Vaccines·2026
Same author

Human Papillomavirus Test Agreement Between Self-Collected Vaginal and Clinician-Collected Cervical Specimens.

Journal of lower genital tract disease·2026
Same author

Effect of a Symptom Surveillance and Collaborative Care Intervention on Palliative Care Utilization.

Journal of pain and symptom management·2026
Same author

Trial-Based Costs for Interventions to Improve HPV Vaccine Uptake.

JAMA network open·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2025

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection
07:35

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection

Published on: June 8, 2020

6.9K

Patient-Provider Communication and Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion Using Multi-target Stool DNA Testing.

Xuan Zhu1, Linda Squiers2, Gabriel Madson2

  • 1Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. zhu.xuan@mayo.edu.

Journal of Cancer Education : the Official Journal of the American Association for Cancer Education
|July 20, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Effective colorectal cancer (CRC) screening communication between patients and providers significantly boosts test completion rates. Discussing costs, follow-up, and instructions improves adherence, while shared decision-making is key.

Keywords:
Cancer educationColorectal cancer screeningMulti-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA)Provider communicationProvider recommendation

More Related Videos

Colorectal Cancer Cell Surface Protein Profiling Using an Antibody Microarray and Fluorescence Multiplexing
15:17

Colorectal Cancer Cell Surface Protein Profiling Using an Antibody Microarray and Fluorescence Multiplexing

Published on: September 25, 2011

13.9K
E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

8.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2025

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection
07:35

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection

Published on: June 8, 2020

6.9K
Colorectal Cancer Cell Surface Protein Profiling Using an Antibody Microarray and Fluorescence Multiplexing
15:17

Colorectal Cancer Cell Surface Protein Profiling Using an Antibody Microarray and Fluorescence Multiplexing

Published on: September 25, 2011

13.9K
E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

8.3K

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Public Health
  • Health Communication

Background:

  • Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is underutilized in the USA, despite available guideline-recommended options.
  • Provider recommendations are crucial for improving CRC screening completion rates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify patient-provider communication factors associated with multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) screening completion.
  • To inform interventions aimed at increasing CRC screening adherence.

Main Methods:

  • A behavioral theory-informed survey was administered to US adults aged 45-75 who received an order for mt-sDNA screening.
  • Multivariable logistic regression analyzed communication factors linked to mt-sDNA test completion.
  • Data collected from 2973 participants (21.7% response rate).

Main Results:

  • 81.6% of participants discussed mt-sDNA testing with their provider before ordering.
  • Conversations covering costs, follow-up, and instructions correlated with higher test completion and future use likelihood.
  • Lack of discussion on screening options' pros/cons and limited patient involvement reduced completion odds.

Conclusions:

  • Healthcare providers are pivotal in enhancing patient adherence to CRC screening.
  • Providers need resources and training to effectively educate patients and facilitate shared decision-making in CRC screening choices.