Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2025
The Double-H Maze: A Robust Behavioral Test for Learning and Memory in Rodents
Published on: July 8, 2015
Bypassing Striatal Learning Mechanisms Using Delayed Feedback to Circumvent Learning Deficits in Traumatic Brain
Ekaterina Dobryakova1, Tien T Tong, Olesya Iosipchuk
1Author Affiliations: Center for Traumatic Brain Injury Research, Kessler Foundation, East Hanover (Dr Dobryakova, Dr Tong, Ms Iosipchuk, Dr Lequerica, Ms Schneider, and Dr Chiaravalloti); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, Newark (Drs Dobryakova, Lequerica, and Chiaravalloti); and Psychology Department, Montclair State University, Montclair, New Jersey (Dr Sandry).
Objective:
Feedback facilitates learning by guiding and modifying behaviors through an action-outcome contingency. As the majority of existing studies have focused on the immediate presentation of feedback, the impact of delayed feedback on learning is understudied. Prior work demonstrated that learning from immediate and delayed feedback employed distinct brain regions in healthy individuals, and compared to healthy individuals, individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) are impaired in learning from immediate feedback. The goal of the current investigation was to assess the effects of delayed vs immediate feedback on learning in individuals with TBI and examine brain networks associated with delayed and immediate feedback processing.
Setting:
Nonprofit research organization.
Participants:
Twenty-eight individuals with moderate-to-severe TBI.
Design:
Participants completed a paired-associate word learning task while undergoing magnetic resonance imaging. During the task, feedback was presented either immediately, after a delay, or not at all (control condition).
Main Measures:
Learning performance accuracy, confidence ratings, post-task questionnaire, and blood oxygen level-dependent signal.
Results:
Behavioral data showed that delayed feedback resulted in better learning performance than immediate feedback and no feedback. In addition, participants reported higher confidence in their performance during delayed feedback trials. During delayed vs immediate feedback processing, greater activation was observed in the superior parietal and angular gyrus. Activation in these areas has been previously associated with successful retrieval and greater memory confidence.
Conclusion:
The observed results might be explained by delayed feedback processing circumventing the striatal dopaminergic regions responsible for learning from immediate feedback that are impaired in TBI. In addition, delayed feedback evokes less of an affective reaction than immediate feedback, which likely benefited memory performance. Indeed, compared to delayed feedback, positive or negative immediate feedback was more likely to be rated as rewarding or punishing, respectively. The findings have significant implications for TBI rehabilitation and suggest that delaying feedback during rehabilitation might recruit brain regions that lead to better functional outcomes.
