Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

34.7K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.7K
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.6K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.6K
Obedience01:08

Obedience

32.8K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
32.8K
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

38.6K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
38.6K
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

44.3K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dysregulated immune system in chronic stress male rats is an outcome of altered mRNA expression, cytokines, and Th1/Th2 balance.

Behavioural brain research·2025
Same author

Chronic psychological stress induces testicular oxidative stress affecting reproductive behavior in rats.

Reproductive biology·2024
Same author

A safety assessment of a 300-meter saturation dive at sea by mental ability and performance efficacy.

Undersea & hyperbaric medicine : journal of the Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society, Inc·2022
Same author

Cytokines/Chemokines: Potential Biomarkers for Non-paraneoplastic Anti-N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis.

Frontiers in neurology·2021
Same author

miR-378d is Involved in the Regulation of Apoptosis and Autophagy of and E<sub>2</sub> Secretion from Cultured Ovarian Granular Cells Treated by Sodium Fluoride.

Biological trace element research·2021
Same author

A tied Fermi liquid to Luttinger liquid model for nonlinear transport in conducting polymers.

Nature communications·2021
Same journal

An Eye-Tracking Study on Text Accessibility and Comprehension in University Students.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

The Relationship Between Physical Activity, Social Support, and Life Satisfaction Among Female College Students: A Variable- and Person-Centered Analysis.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Shifting the Blame: How Narrative Framing, Coercive Strategies, and Rape Myth Acceptance Distort Perceptions of Sexual Assault and Fuel Victim Blame.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

An AI Perspective on Counseling Supervision.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Symbolic Participation or Substantial Learning Behavior? A PSM-Based Comparison Between Honors and Non-Honors Undergraduates from Two Top Elite Universities in China.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Literacy Profiles in Twice-Exceptional Preadolescents with Intellectual Giftedness and Dyslexia.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 19, 2025

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
06:17

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

4.9K

Can Leading by Example Alone Improve Cooperation?

Ziying Zhang1, Nguepi Tsafack Elvis2, Jiawei Wang1

  • 1School of Psychology, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China.

Behavioral Sciences (Basel, Switzerland)
|July 27, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Leaders can foster cooperation by rewarding good behavior and punishing free riders. While both methods work, punishment is more effective for sustained collaboration, though leaders prefer rewards.

Keywords:
incentive effectleading by examplepublic cooperationpublic goods game

More Related Videos

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.3K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 19, 2025

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
06:17

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

4.9K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.3K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.0K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Social Psychology
  • Game Theory

Background:

  • Cooperation is fundamental to human societies.
  • Understanding cooperation mechanisms is key to human behavior studies.
  • Leadership's role in cooperation requires further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of leadership on public cooperation.
  • To examine if leading by example (rewards/punishments) enhances cooperation and organizational success.

Main Methods:

  • Repeated sequential public goods games were employed.
  • Leaders were randomly assigned with authority to reward or punish.
  • Analysis focused on leaders' reciprocity and the effects of rewards/punishments.

Main Results:

  • Leaders exhibited strong reciprocity, punishing free riders and rewarding cooperators at personal cost.
  • This leadership behavior enhanced intrinsic motivation for others to cooperate.
  • Both rewards and punishments promoted cooperation, with punishment being more effective for sustained collaboration.

Conclusions:

  • Leadership significantly impacts public cooperation through reciprocity and strategic use of rewards/punishments.
  • Punishment is more effective than rewards for maintaining high levels of cooperation.
  • Leaders' preference for rewards over punishments presents a challenge for sustained cooperation strategies.