Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2025

12:18
An Instrumented Pull Test to Characterize Postural Responses
Published on: April 6, 2019
10.8K
Kinetic Predictors of Weightlifting Performance in Young Weightlifters
Stephanie J Morris1, Jon L Oliver1,2, Jason S Pedley1
1Youth Physical Development Centre, Cardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
|July 29, 2024
Summary
Kinetic variables from the countermovement jump (CMJ) and isometric midthigh pull (IMTP) tests can predict weightlifting performance in young athletes. These tests offer valuable insights for talent identification and development in junior weightlifters.
Area of Science:
- Sports Science
- Biomechanics
- Strength and Conditioning
Background:
- Previous research explored force-generating capabilities and weightlifting performance in adult weightlifters.
- Associations between kinetic variables and performance in young weightlifters remain largely unexplored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine relationships between countermovement jump (CMJ) and isometric midthigh pull (IMTP) kinetics and weightlifting performance in young weightlifters.
- To determine the proportion of weightlifting performance predictable by CMJ and IMTP kinetics using principal component analysis (PCA).
Main Methods:
- Thirty-seven young weightlifters (12-18 years) underwent CMJ and IMTP assessments using dual force plates.
- Competition maximum loads for snatch and clean and jerk (C&J) were recorded within two weeks of testing.
- Pearson correlations and PCA-driven stepwise multiple linear regression analyses were employed.
Main Results:
- Moderate to very high correlations (r = 0.359-0.801) were found between CMJ kinetic variables and weightlifting performance metrics.
- High to very high correlations (r = 0.538-0.796) existed between IMTP peak force variables and all weightlifting performance metrics.
- IMTP peak force variables explained 45.8-52.9% of variance in absolute weightlifting performance, while CMJ propulsive variables explained 79.1-81.3%.
Conclusions:
- Kinetic variables from CMJ and IMTP tests are significant predictors of weightlifting performance in young athletes.
- These findings highlight the utility of IMTP peak force and CMJ propulsive variables for talent identification.
- The study suggests these kinetic assessments can inform long-term athletic development strategies in junior weightlifting programs.

