Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning Algorithms Versus Standard Linear Demographic Analysis in Predicting Implant
Amir Boubekri1, Michael Murphy, Michael Scheidt
1From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Loyola University Health System, Maywood, IL (Dr. Boubekri, Dr. Murphy, Dr. Scheidt, Mr. Shivdasani, Mr. Anderson, Dr. Garbis, and Dr. Salazar), the Carle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign, Champaign, IL (Mr. Shivdasani).
Background:
Accurate and precise templating is paramount for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) to enhance preoperative planning, streamline surgery, and improve implant positioning. We aimed to evaluate the predictive potential of readily available patient demographic data in TSA and RSA implant sizing, independent of implant design.
Methods:
A total of 578 consecutive, primary, noncemented shoulder arthroplasty cases were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic variables and implant characteristics were recorded. Multivariate linear regressions were conducted to predict implant sizes using patient demographic variables.
Results:
Linear models accurately predict TSA implant sizes within 2 millimeters of humerus stem sizes 75.3% of the time, head diameter 82.1%, head height 82.1%, and RSA glenosphere diameter 77.6% of the time. Linear models predict glenoid implant sizes accurately 68.2% and polyethylene thickness 76.6% of the time and within one size 100% and 95.7% of the time, respectively.
Conclusion:
Linear models accurately predict shoulder arthroplasty implant sizes from demographic data. No significant statistical differences were observed between linear models and machine learning algorithms, although the analysis was underpowered. Future sufficiently powered studies are required for more robust assessment of machine learning models in predicting primary shoulder arthroplasty implant sizes based on patient demographics.
