Stretched to the Limit: Comparing Polytetrafluoroethylene-Covered Endovascular Stents Through Serial Dilations

Ernesto Mejia1, Emily C Kish1, Martin L Bocks1

  • 1Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University Hospitals, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

Insights

VBX stents demonstrated more predictable fracture patterns and less recoil than iCast stents during in vitro dilation. However, VBX stents showed increased foreshortening with postdilation, impacting pediatric congenital cardiac interventions.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Materials Science
  • Pediatric Cardiology

Background:

  • Covered stents are crucial for congenital cardiac interventions in children.
  • Postdilation capability is essential for accommodating somatic growth.
  • Understanding stent performance under dilation is vital for pediatric interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Compare in vitro performance of iCast and VBX covered stents.
  • Determine fracture and polytetrafluoroethylene tear thresholds.
  • Define recoil and foreshortening characteristics during serial dilations.

Main Methods:

  • iCast and VBX stents of various sizes were subjected to serial dilations.
  • Dilation increments were 2 mm until stent fracture or polytetrafluoroethylene tear.
  • Maximum tested diameter was 22 mm.

Main Results:

  • VBX stents fractured at specific balloon sizes, showing predictable patterns.
  • iCast stents exhibited partial to complete fractures between 14- and 16-mm dilations.
  • VBX stents had less recoil but more foreshortening during postdilation compared to iCast.

Conclusions:

  • VBX stents offer more predictable fracture behavior than iCast stents.
  • iCast stents showed unpredictable fracturing patterns.
  • Findings inform clinical decisions for pediatric congenital heart interventions.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos