Does the proximal screw type affect stress and strain in pastern arthrodesis with locking plate in horses?

The implantation of unicortical cortex screws in the proximal hole of locking compression plates (LCP) has been recommended for proximal interphalangeal (PIP) arthrodesis in horses to prevent fractures resulting from stress risers in the proximal phalanx (P1). However, this cortex screw fixation technique may limit efficient dorsal compression of the PIP joint by the plate, potentially affecting the stability of the construct. In this study, we aimed to measure stress and strain in P1 and the plate using an ex vivo model of PIP arthrodesis in horses. We employed various implantation methods and proximal screw types in conjunction with two 5.5 mm transarticular cortex screws. Ten pairs of equine forelimbs were divided into four groups based on proximal screw placement: GUC (unicortically placed cortex screw), GBC (bicortically placed cortex screw), GUL (unicortically placed locking screw), and GBL (bicortically placed locking screw). We calculated the magnitude and direction of strain, strain ratio, and stress using strain gauges during an axial compression mechanical testing. The palmar surface of P1 exhibited higher stress and strains than the dorsal surface, with the plate part located at the articular level suffered more stress than the proximal part. Both the implantation method and proximal screw type significantly influenced the analyzed parameters. The GUC promoted greater changes in strain direction in the proximal portion of the P1. Bicortical placement of a cortex screw appears to be the most suitable option for filling the proximal hole of the LCP, because it allows effective dynamic compression via the plate and prevents abrupt shifts in the direction of the forces acting on the proximal part of P1 during loading.