Wound healing after intracutaneous vs. staple-assisted skin closure in lumbar, non-instrumented spine surgery: a
Alexander Romagna1,2, Jens Lehmberg3, Michael Meier3
1Department of Neurosurgery, München Klinik Bogenhausen, Englschalkinger Str. 77, 81925, Munich, Germany. alexander.romagna@muenchen-klinik.de.
Purpose:
Superficial surgical site infection (SSSI) is a prominent problem in spine surgery. Intracutaneous sutures and staple-assisted closure are two widely used surgical techniques for skin closure. Yet, their comparative impact on wound healing and infection rates is underexplored. Our goal was to address this gap and compare wound healing between these two techniques.
Methods:
This study was a multicenter international prospective randomized trial. Patient data were prospectively collected at three large academic centers, patients who underwent non-instrumented lumbar primary spine surgery were included. Patients were intraoperatively randomized to either intracutaneous suture or staple-assisted closure cohorts. The primary endpoint was SSSI within 30 days after surgery according to the wound infection Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) classification system.
Results:
Of 207 patients, 110 were randomized to intracutaneous sutures and 97 to staple-assisted closure. Both groups were homogenous with respect to epidemiological as well as surgical parameters. Two patients (one of each group) suffered from an A1 wound infection at the 30-day follow up. Median skin closure time was faster in the staple-assisted closure group (198 s vs. 13 s, p < 0,001).
Conclusion:
This study showed an overall low superficial surgical site infection rate in both patient cohorts in primary non instrumented spine surgery.
