Miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE): Factors influencing planning

This cross-sectional study evaluated the bone thickness on mini-implants insertion site, the factors that influence the digital planning of MARPE appliance (miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion), and its different designs.

A total of 135 plannings were assessed regarding the size of the expander screw used, the positioning and the type of the mini-implant rings, and their location in relation to the teeth. Bone thickness measurements were assessed in the region of the mini-implants' trajectory. Differences between the sexes was verified using the ANOVA test (5% significance).

73 cases were planned with 4 mini-implants and 62 cases, with 6 mini-implants. In 90% of cases, teeth #16 and #26 were used as supports, and the most used expander screw was 13mm (64.1% of cases). The anterior mini-implants of conventional MARPE showed more pronounced insertion in bone in males (5.9 ± 2mm; p= 0.025). The extra mini-implants (anterior region) were inserted with greater bone thickness in males (11.1 ± 2.3mm) compared to females (9.9 ± 1.8mm; p=0.041). A greater bone thickness was observed in males (10.1 ± 2.1 mm) when using mini-implants in the paramedian region.

Additional rings allow more pronounced bone insertion. Male patients had greater bone thickness, which may be related to greater difficulty in opening the sutures. The alveolar process region seems to be a satisfactory site for mini-implants to those patients with reduced bone thickness in the paramedian posterior region. MARPE appliance must be customized for each patient, due to bone thickness and anatomical variations.