31-GEP (DecisionDx): a review of clinical utility and performance in a Mayo Clinic cohort
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Determining Optimal Cytotoxic Activity of Human Her2neu Specific CD8 T cells by Comparing the Cr51 Release Assay to the xCELLigence System
Published on: August 8, 2012
Ani Pazhava1, Yong-Hun Kim1, Frank Z Jing1
1Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Background:
Cutaneous melanoma (CM) is a significant health concern because of its high metastatic potential. Gene Expression Profile (GEP) testing, particularly the 31-GEP test (DecisionDx-Melanoma), has been increasingly used for risk stratification in CM patients. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility and performance of the 31-GEP test in a real-world setting.
Methods:
Patients with CM who underwent 31-GEP testing from August 2014 to August 2022 at our institution were identified through searches of electronic health records. The study analyzed the influence of 31-GEP testing on clinical decision-making related to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), medical oncology referral, and postdiagnosis surveillance. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models were used to elucidate the test's performance, focusing on relapse-free survival (RFS) and melanoma-specific survival (MSS).
Results:
The study included 65 CM patients. Dermatologists ordered more than 80% of 31-GEP tests. In 81.5% of cases, 31-GEP results did not alter standard clinical management. SLNB decisions were unaffected in 92% of patients with pre-SLNB 31-GEP results. Among patients with stage I-IIA melanoma, 25% of those with high-risk 31-GEP results were referred to medical oncology. Contrary to expectations, the rate of nodal metastasis was higher in low-risk than in high-risk 31-GEP cases. Survival analysis showed overlapping RFS and MSS curves between different 31-GEP classes, suggesting limited prognostic value.
Conclusions:
The 31-GEP test has a limited impact on clinical management decisions and shows limited prognostic value.
More Related Videos
07:35Use of Ultra-high Field MRI in Small Rodent Models of Polycystic Kidney Disease for In Vivo Phenotyping and Drug Monitoring
Published on: June 23, 2015
10:27Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Kaplan-Meier Approach