[Between clinical and forensic imaging : Differences, similarities and legal framework]

Area of Science:

• Medical Imaging
• Forensic Science
• Radiology

Background:

• Clinical imaging utilizes techniques like X-ray, CT, MRI, and ultrasound for diagnosis and treatment.
• Forensic imaging applies similar techniques to living and deceased individuals in criminal investigations.
• Postmortem imaging (PMCT, PMCTA) adapts clinical procedures for forensic contexts.

Purpose of the Study:

• To differentiate clinical and forensic imaging applications.
• To highlight the legal and procedural distinctions between clinical and forensic imaging.
• To emphasize the requirements for forensic image admissibility in court.

Main Methods:

• Review of clinical and forensic imaging techniques.
• Analysis of procedural adaptations for postmortem examinations.
• Examination of legal and ethical guidelines for both imaging types.

Main Results:

• Clinical imaging focuses on patient diagnosis and care.
• Forensic imaging serves legal investigations, demanding stringent quality and documentation.
• Postmortem imaging requires modifications and specific consent (e.g., from a prosecutor).

Conclusions:

• Forensic imaging differs significantly from clinical imaging in purpose, context, and legal requirements.
• Admissibility of forensic images as evidence necessitates adherence to strict quality and authenticity standards.
• Both clinical and forensic imaging must comply with privacy and procedural regulations, with distinct consent protocols.