Left-digit bias in out-hospital cardiac arrest: The JCS-ReSS study
Takahiro Suzuki1, Atsushi Mizuno1,2,3, Daisuke Yoneoka4
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Insights
This study found no evidence that the left-digit bias influences medical decisions in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) cases. Age-related cognitive biases did not affect bystander CPR or physician-led advanced cardiac life support.
Area of Science:
- Medical decision-making
- Cognitive biases
- Emergency medicine
Background:
- The left-digit bias (LDB) is a cognitive bias potentially affecting medical practitioners' decisions.
- Its impact on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) care is under-researched.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of age-related left-digit bias on medical decision-making in OHCA patients.
- To examine if LDB affects bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) and prehospital advanced cardiac life support (ACLS).
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of OHCA cases from the All-Japan Utstein Registry (2005-2020).
- Utilized regression discontinuity methodology to assess changes in BCPR and ACLS at age thresholds (60, 70, 80, 90).
Main Results:
- No significant discontinuities in BCPR (chest compressions, ventilation, AED use) by family members were observed at age thresholds.
- No discontinuities in paramedic or physician interventions (chest compressions, airway management, AED use, ACLS) were found at any age threshold.
Conclusions:
- The study found no evidence that age-related left-digit bias impacts medical decision-making in OHCA patients.
- BCPR and prehospital ACLS appear unaffected by LDB in this cohort.
Introduction:
The left-digit bias (LDB), a numerical-related cognitive bias, not only potentially influences decision-making among the general public but also that of medical practitioners. Few studies have investigated its role in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).
Methods:
We retrospectively included all consecutive patients with OHCA witnessed by family members registered in the All-Japan Utstein Registry of the Fire and Disaster Management Agency between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2020. Target outcomes were the percentage of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) performed by family members or paramedics and the percentage of prehospital physician-staffed advanced cardiac life support (ACLS). Using a nonparametric regression discontinuity methodology, we examined whether a significant change occurred in the percentages of BCPR and ACLS at the age thresholds of 60, 70, 80, and 90 years, which would indicate the presence of LDB.
Results:
Of the 1,930,273 OHCA cases in the All-Japan Utstein Registry, 384,200 (19.9%) cases witnessed by family members were analyzed. The mean age was 75.8 years (±SD 13.7), with 38.0% (n = 146,137) female. We identified no discontinuities in the percentages of chest compressions, mouth-to-mouth ventilation, or automated external defibrillator (AED) usage by family members for the age thresholds of 60, 70, 80, and 90 years. Moreover, no discontinuities existed in the percentages of chest compressions, advanced airway management, and AED usage by paramedics or prehospital ACLS by physicians for any of the age thresholds.
Conclusions:
In conclusion, our study did not find any evidence that age-related LDB affects medical decision-making in patients with OHCA.
Related Concept Videos
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Introduction Cardiac Emergencies
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use


