Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2025

09:15
DNA-based Fish Species Identification Protocol
Published on: April 28, 2010
29.4K
Skin swabbing protocol to collect DNA samples from small-bodied fish species
Ceinwen Tilley1,2, Iain Barber3,4, William Norton5,6
1Genetics and Genome Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, England, LE1 7RH, UK.
F1000Research
|August 26, 2024
Summary
This study introduces skin swabbing as a humane method for collecting fish DNA, reducing stress and data variability compared to traditional fin clipping. This DNA sampling technique improves animal welfare and experimental consistency in laboratory research.
Area of Science:
- * Animal models in scientific research
- * Molecular biology and genetics
- * Aquatic animal welfare
Background:
- * Fin clipping is the standard DNA sampling method for laboratory fish.
- * Fin clipping can negatively impact fish health, behavior, and data integrity.
- * There is a need for less invasive DNA collection techniques in fish research.
Purpose of the Study:
- * To adapt and validate a skin swabbing protocol for DNA collection from small laboratory fish.
- * To compare the impact of skin swabbing versus fin clipping on fish stress and behavior.
- * To assess the effect of DNA sampling method on data variability.
Main Methods:
- * Developed a protocol using rayon-tipped swabs to collect mucus from the flank of fish.
- * Applied the protocol to small-bodied fish species, including sticklebacks and zebrafish.
- * Measured stress axis activation, behavior, gene expression, and data variability.
Main Results:
- * Skin swabbing induced fewer changes in stress axis activation and behavior than fin clipping.
- * DNA samples from skin swabbing yielded less variable gene expression and behavior data.
- * The protocol does not require analgesics, anesthetics, or sharp instruments.
Conclusions:
- * Skin swabbing is a less invasive and effective alternative to fin clipping for fish DNA sampling.
- * This method improves animal welfare and reduces experimental data variability.
- * Reduced data variability may allow for smaller experimental group sizes, decreasing overall animal use.

