Beyond bone volume: Understanding tissue-level quality in healing of maxillary vs. femoral defects

Currently, principles of tissue engineering and implantology are uniformly applied to all bone sites, disregarding inherent differences in collagen, mineral composition, and healing rates between craniofacial and long bones. These differences could potentially influence bone quality during the healing process. Evaluating bone quality during healing is crucial for understanding local mechanical properties in regeneration and implant osseointegration. However, site-specific changes in bone quality during healing remain poorly understood. In this study, we assessed newly formed bone quality in sub-critical defects in the maxilla and femur, while impairing collagen cross-linking using β-aminopropionitrile (BAPN). Our findings revealed that femoral healing bone exhibited a 73 % increase in bone volume but showed significantly greater viscoelastic and collagen changes compared to surrounding bone, leading to increased deformation during long-term loading and poorer bone quality in early healing. In contrast, the healing maxilla maintained equivalent hardness and viscoelastic constants compared to surrounding bone, with minimal new bone formation and consistent bone quality. However, BAPN-impaired collagen cross-linking induced viscoelastic changes in the healing maxilla, with no further changes observed in the femur. These results challenge the conventional belief that increased bone volume correlates with enhanced tissue-level bone quality, providing crucial insights for tissue engineering and site-specific implant strategies. The observed differences in bone quality between sites underscore the need for a nuanced approach in assessing the success of regeneration and implant designs and emphasize the importance of exploring site-specific tissue engineering interventions. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Accurate measurement of bone quality is crucial for tissue engineering and implant therapies. Bone quality varies between craniofacial and long bones, yet it's often overlooked in the healing process. Our study is the first to comprehensively analyze bone quality during healing in both the maxilla and femur. Surprisingly, despite significant volume increase, femur healing bone had poorer quality compared to the surrounding bone. Conversely, maxilla healing bone maintained consistent quality despite minimal bone formation. Impaired collagen diminished maxillary healing bone quality, but had no further effect on femur bone quality. These findings challenge the notion that more bone volume equals better quality, offering insights for improving tissue engineering and implant strategies for different bone sites.