Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

117
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
117
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

1.9K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
1.9K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

183
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
183
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

4.2K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
4.2K
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

2.7K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
2.7K
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

6.2K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
6.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

CIT-Lasso: a scalable approach beyond guilty by association for identifying causal variants from genome-wide summary statistics.

Genome biology·2026
Same author

Disease Outcomes in Boys with <i>ABCD1</i> Variants Identified by Newborn Screening for X-ALD.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Functional connectivity in self-limited epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes increases with epilepsy duration and interictal spike exposure.

Epilepsia·2026
Same author

Integrative Genetic, Proteogenomic, and Multi-omics Analyses Reveal Sex-Biased Causal Genes and Drug Targets in Alzheimer's Disease.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025
Same author

Socioeconomic Factors Associated With Migraine Medication Prescription at a Tertiary Headache Center: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

Neurology. Clinical practice·2025
Same author

Abnormal Elevated Connectivity During Language Processing is Associated with Poor Cognitive Performance in Children with Self-limited Epilepsy with Centrotemporal Spikes.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 14, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K

Summary statistics knockoffs inference with family-wise error rate control.

Catherine Xinrui Yu1, Jiaqi Gu2, Zhaomeng Chen3

  • 1Department of Statistics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 999077, China.

Biometrics
|September 2, 2024
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new method for feature selection using summary statistics, ensuring reliable error control. The approach enhances statistical power and computational efficiency for conditional independence testing.

Keywords:
Alzheimer’s disease geneticsconditional independencefamily-wise error rateknockoffssummary statistics

More Related Videos

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.0K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K
Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.0K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.3K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Genetics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Conditional independence testing is crucial for feature selection in complex datasets.
  • Existing methods struggle with error rate control when using only summary statistics.
  • Computational efficiency is a significant challenge in large-scale statistical analyses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel method for inferring conditional independence with family-wise error rate (FWER) control.
  • To improve feature selection accuracy using only summary statistics of marginal dependence.
  • To enhance the computational efficiency of generating knockoff statistics.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the GhostKnockoff framework to generate knockoff copies of summary statistics.
  • Proposed a new filtering technique for selecting features with conditional dependence on the response.
  • Developed an efficient algorithm to reduce the computational cost of knockoff generation.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method demonstrated superior statistical power compared to existing alternatives.
  • Achieved significant improvements in computational efficiency for knockoff statistics generation.
  • Successfully applied the method to simulated data and a real-world Alzheimer's disease genetics dataset.

Conclusions:

  • The new method offers a powerful and computationally efficient solution for conditional independence testing.
  • It provides reliable family-wise error rate control, outperforming current approaches.
  • The findings have significant implications for feature selection in genetics and other data-intensive fields.